Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The special-vertex-local structural-partition criterion implies property (*)

Statement

Let F1,F2 have a common Erdős–Hajnal constant c(0,1]. Suppose that, in every H-free graph, every special-vertex comb occurring in the definition of property () has a partition satisfying clauses (1), (2.1)--(2.3) of the structural comb partition. Then H has property ().

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite graph families and common constant c(0,1] in the Statement, and the supplied partition for each special-vertex comb in the property-() trigger. For that comb, write Bi=Xi˙Yi. The local clauses mean that Yi is F1-free, (A1i,,Atii) partitions Xi into nonempty blocks forming a pure blockade with F2-free pattern, and each vertex in another Bh is pure to each Aji. These are the partition clauses of The structural comb-partition hypothesis; its universal assertion about all combs is not assumed.

[F1]

A common Erdős–Hajnal constant c supplies a clique or stable set of size at least nc in each nonempty n-vertex F1-free or F2-free graph (The Erdős–Hajnal property and an Erdős–Hajnal constant for a hereditary graph class). Induced subgraphs of a family-free graph remain family-free (H-free and F-free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention).

[F2]

A pure blockade has pairwise complete or anticomplete blocks; its pattern records precisely the complete pairs (Complete, anticomplete, pure, weakly sparse, and x-sparse blockades, The pattern graph of a pure blockade). Blockades have disjoint nonempty blocks and the stated lower bounds on length and width (Blockades, their length, their width, and their support).

[F3]

Integral geometric layers use the cutoff mr=min{t,r/2} and consecutive blocks through the first cutoff attaining t (Integral geometric layers of a decreasing block partition).

Proof

technique · contradiction
1.1

Set c1=c3=c/4>0 and c2=10/c>0. Fix an arbitrary H-free finite graph G and a special-vertex (,w)-comb from Property (*) for a finite graph family, with integral 4 and real w4. Use its supplied local partition. Suppose that all three property-() outcomes with these constants fail.

givenassume-contra
2.1

If Yiw/2 for some i, then Yi is nonempty and [F1] supplies a clique or stable set of size at least (w/2)cwc/2wc/4, since w4. This contradicts the first failure. Hence every Yi<w/2, and Biw implies Xi>w/2.

givenF1F4step 1.1algebra
2.2

If every partition has a block Di=Ajii of size at least w/(2), choose one for each of the finitely many indices i. Fix distinct i,h. Each vertex of Dh is complete or anticomplete to Di by the local external-purity clause. Two vertices of Dh with opposite relations would make any vertex of the nonempty Di mixed on Dh, contrary to the same clause with i,h reversed. Thus Di,Dh are pure. The disjoint sequence (D1,,D) is consequently a pure blockade of width at least w/(2)w/2, contradicting the third failure.

givenF2step 1.1choosealgebra
3.1

By step 2.2 there is an index i such that every Aji<w/(2), hence is at most this bound. Put X=Xi, t=ti, and reorder these blocks as A1,,At in nonincreasing size. Reordering preserves purity and changes the pattern only by relabelling. Since w/2<X=j=1tAjtw/(2), we have t. The reordered pattern is still F2-free.

givenF2step 2.1step 2.2algebra
4.1

Form the cutoffs of [F3]. They reach t: for example, t/22tt for the positive integer t, the latter elementary inequality following by induction. Let q be the first index with mq=t. Since m1<t, we have q2. For 2rq, the integer mr1+1 is at most t and at most 2(r1)/2r/2, so mrmr1+1. Thus all layers C1,,Cq are nonempty and partition the blocks in order.

F3F4step 3.1constructalgebra
5.1

For 1r<q, put x=r/22. Then mr=x2, so x<mr+1mr2, yielding mrx=r/4. Also m11/2 and each Cr+1 contains at most mr+1(r+1)/2 blocks, including when r+1=q.

F3F4step 4.1algebra
6.1

Suppose a preterminal layer Cr, 1r<q, has every block of size at least w/5r/2. The first mr blocks all have at least that size by their nonincreasing order. Their induced pattern is nonempty and F2-free, so [F1] gives a pattern clique or stable set S of integral cardinality kmrccr/4. By [F2], the blocks indexed by S form a complete or anticomplete blockade of length k and width at least w/5r/2.

F1F2F4step 3.1step 5.1assume-hyp
7.1

Since k10/c5r/2 and kcr/4c/4, this blockade has width at least w/k10/c and satisfies the second property-() outcome. That contradicts step 1.1. Therefore every preterminal Cr contains a block of size strictly less than w/5r/2.

F4step 1.1step 6.1algebra
8.1

The first layer contributes at most 1/2w/(2)=w/(2)w/4 vertices. For 1r<q, every block in Cr+1 follows the small block in Cr and has size less than w/5r/2. Hence Cr+1 contributes less than w(r+1)/25r/2=w1/22r.

F4step 3.1step 5.1step 7.1algebra
9.1

Because 4 and 1/22r<0, the sum of the latter bounds is at most wr141/22r=(w/8)s016s=2w/15. All layers have been counted, so X<w/4+2w/15=23w/60<w/2, contradicting step 2.1.

F4F5step 4.1step 8.1step 2.1algebradischarge-contradiction
10.1

Thus one of the three outcomes holds for every special-vertex comb required by Property (*) for a finite graph family, with constants independent of G and the comb. This proves that H has property ().

step 1.1step 9.1discharge-contradiction

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

44 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources