How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Integral geometric layers of a decreasing block partition
Definition
Let be a partition into nonempty blocks with , where . For each integer , put The set is nonempty because , and finite, so this maximum is an integer. Let be the least for which . The integral geometric layers are
Thus every index used here is integral; the layers are consecutive portions of the original ordered partition. Real powers are those in The exponent, product, quotient, and iterated-power laws for positive real bases and real exponents, and a block has the nonempty meaning of Blockades, their length, their width, and their support.
Depends on
Used by
- Integral geometric layers for fourteen ordered blocks Example
- A wide integral geometric layer forces the complete-or-anticomplete property-(*) blockade Lemma
- Integral geometric layers exist, cover the partition, and retain the required cutoff bounds Lemma
- Successive small integral geometric layers contradict a large X-part Lemma
- The structural comb-partition criterion implies property (*) Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Huang, Ju, and Zhou, Erdős–Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, proof of Lemma 5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)