How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
If a tooth sees a foreign block, the structure is not a comb
Statement refuted
Refuted claim: a sequence of teeth and blocks is still a comb even if some tooth is adjacent to a foreign block.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Two blocks and , and two teeth with edges , , and .
Proof
The tooth is complete to its own block , but it is also adjacent to the foreign block .
The definition Combs in a graph requires every tooth to be anticomplete to every foreign block with . Step 1.1 violates that requirement, so this data is not a comb.
Therefore the claim is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)