Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Weak sparsity of a pair does not force directional sparsity

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: if a pair (X,Y) is weakly c-sparse, then X is c-sparse to Y.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X={x1,x2}, Y={y1,y2}, c=12, and the edges x1y1,x1y2 only.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The ordered cross-edge count is e(X,Y)=2, so e(X,Y)=212XY=1222=2. Thus (X,Y) is weakly 12-sparse.

givenalgebra
1.2

But x1 has two neighbors in Y, and 2>12Y=122=1. So X is not 12-sparse to Y.

givenalgebra
2.1

Therefore weak sparsity does not imply directional sparsity.

step 1.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources