How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
FALSE: reversing the order of the blocks never changes -sparsity
Statement
False claim: the order of the blocks is irrelevant for the property of being -sparse.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Two blocks and with the single edge and with as the sparsity parameter.
An ordered blockade is -sparse exactly when the later block is -sparse to the earlier block (Complete, anticomplete, pure, weakly sparse, and -sparse blockades).
Proof
The one-vertex block is -sparse to , because has one neighbor in and . By [L1], the ordered blockade is therefore -sparse.
The block is not -sparse to , because the vertex has one neighbor in but . By [L1], the reversed blockade is therefore not -sparse.
Therefore reversing the order can change -sparsity, so the claim is false.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)