Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A special-vertex co-Bird-free comb admits an E-free structural partition

Statement

Let ((ak,Bk):k[]) be an (,w)-comb in a finite simple co-Bird-free graph G, and let v be outside all teeth and blocks, complete to every Bk and anticomplete to every tooth. For every i[] there exist disjoint sets Xi,Yi with Bi=XiYi such that G[Yi] is E-free, and Xi has a partition into a nonempty ordered sequence (A1i,,Atii) of nonempty sets satisfying: the sequence is a pure blockade, its pattern is E-free, and each individual vertex of every other comb block is pure to each Aji. The blocks Aji may additionally be chosen anticonnected.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

E overlap chains inside one comb block supplies the following definition: Fix a block Bi of a finite graph comb (def-comb-in-a-graph). Let Ei consist of all six-vertex subsets of Bi inducing the graph in def-e-graph-and-co-e-graph. Put Xi=SEiS and Yi=BiXi. For d,eXi, define dRie if there exist m0 and vertices d=d0,d1,,dm=e in Xi such that each consecutive pair is contained in some SEi. A zero-length chain is allowed. If Ei is empty then Xi and the relation are empty. We call this the E overlap chain relation.

[F2]

E overlap quotients terminate at a pure blockade supplies the following statement: For nonempty overlap support, put n=L1. Every stage Ls partitions the same support into nonempty anticonnected blocks and coarsens L1. There is a least q1 for which Lq is pure, with qn. At most n1 strict transitions occur, and all stages from q onward are identical.

[F3]

The terminal E overlap pattern is E-free supplies the following statement: For a comb block with nonempty E overlap support, the pattern graph of its terminal pure quotient blockade Lq is E-free.

[F4]

External purity survives every E overlap quotient supplies the following statement: Let ((ak,Bk):k[]) be an (,w)-comb in a finite simple co-Bird-free graph G, and let v be outside all teeth and blocks, complete to every Bk and anticomplete to every tooth. Fix i with nonempty E overlap support. For every s1, every block L of Ls and every vertex ukiBk, the vertex u is pure to L.

[F5]

Combs in a graph supplies the following definition: Let N with 1, and let w>0. An (,w)-comb in a graph G is a sequence of pairs ((ai,Bi):i[]) satisfying the conditions below. Here a vertex a is complete to (respectively, anticomplete to) a set B when the pair ({a},B) is complete (respectively, anticomplete) in the sense of def-edges-between-sets-and-pure-mixed-pairs. 1. (B1,,B) is an (,w)-blockade; 2. the vertices a1,,a are distinct; 3. the set {a1,,a} is disjoint from every block Bi; and 4. for every i[], the vertex ai is complete to Bi; and 5. for all distinct i,j[], the vertex ai is anticomplete to Bj. The vertices ai are the teeth of the comb.

[F6]

H-free and F-free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention supplies the following definition: For finite graphs H and G, the graph G is H-free when G has no induced copy of H (def-induced-embedding-and-induced-copy). Equivalently, indH(G)=0 (def-induced-copy-number). For a family F of finite graphs, a finite graph G is F-free when it is H-free for every HF. Throughout this page, “free” always refers to induced subgraphs. It does not merely prohibit ordinary subgraph copies.

[F7]

The E-graph and co-E supplies the following definition: The E-graph is the graph on vertices {p1,p2,p3,p4,p5,q} with edge set {p1p2,p2p3,p3p4,p4p5,p3q}. Thus p1p2p3p4p5 is a five-vertex path and q is a leaf attached to its middle vertex p3. The co-E graph is the complement of this graph.

[F8]

The Bird graph and co-Bird supplies the following definition: The Bird graph is the graph on vertices {x1,x2,x3,y,z,w} with edge set {x1x2,x2x3,x1x3,x1y,x2z,yw}. So {x1,x2,x3,y,z} spans the bull, and w is a new leaf attached to the horn vertex y. The co-Bird graph is the complement of the Bird graph.

Proof

Given: The graph, vertices, sets and hypotheses in the statement.

1.1

The forbidden pattern here is the complement of the six-vertex Bird, and freeness means absence of an induced copy. Fix i. The comb definition ensures Bi is nonempty. Use its overlap support Xi0 and complement Yi0.

F8F6F5F1
1.2

If Xi0 is nonempty, set Xi=Xi0 and Yi=Yi0. An induced E in Yi would put all its vertices in the overlap support, contradicting disjointness. Take the terminal quotient as the partition of Xi; it is a nonempty pure blockade of anticonnected sets.

F1F2
1.3

The terminal pattern is E-free. Every vertex of another comb block is pure to every terminal block by external quotient purity, with the same given comb and special vertex. This verifies all claims in the nonempty-support case.

F3F4
1.4

If Xi0 is empty, there is no induced E anywhere in Bi. Choose the first vertex b in a fixed finite enumeration of this nonempty block, and set Xi={b}, Yi=Bi{b}. Then Yi is E-free. The one-block sequence ({b}) is pure, anticonnected and has a one-vertex pattern, which cannot contain the six-vertex E. Any outside vertex is either adjacent or nonadjacent to b, so is pure to this block.

F1F5F7
2.1

The two support cases exhaust every i. Use a fixed enumeration of the finite ambient vertex set for all choices and block orderings. When =1 there are no other-block vertices, so that clause is vacuous; Yi is allowed to be empty. The constructions establish the assertion for all blocks.

given

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources