Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The terminal E overlap pattern is E-free

Statement

For a comb block with nonempty E overlap support, the pattern graph of its terminal pure quotient blockade Lq is E-free.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

E overlap quotients terminate at a pure blockade supplies the following statement: For nonempty overlap support, put n=L1. Every stage Ls partitions the same support into nonempty anticonnected blocks and coarsens L1. There is a least q1 for which Lq is pure, with qn. At most n1 strict transitions occur, and all stages from q onward are identical.

[F2]

E overlap chains inside one comb block supplies the following definition: Fix a block Bi of a finite graph comb (def-comb-in-a-graph). Let Ei consist of all six-vertex subsets of Bi inducing the graph in def-e-graph-and-co-e-graph. Put Xi=SEiS and Yi=BiXi. For d,eXi, define dRie if there exist m0 and vertices d=d0,d1,,dm=e in Xi such that each consecutive pair is contained in some SEi. A zero-length chain is allowed. If Ei is empty then Xi and the relation are empty. We call this the E overlap chain relation. Throughout this definition, “the graph in def-e-graph-and-co-e-graph” means the E-graph defined there, not the co-E graph.

[F3]

The pattern graph of a pure blockade supplies the following definition: Let B=(B1,,Bt) be a pure blockade in a graph G. Its pattern graph is the graph P(B) with vertex set [t] in which i and j are adjacent exactly when Bi is complete to Bj. Because the blockade is pure, every unordered pair of distinct blocks is either complete or anticomplete, so this graph is well defined. A pattern graph is called P4-free when it contains no induced four-vertex path.

[F4]

The E-graph and co-E supplies the following definition: The E-graph is the graph on vertices {p1,p2,p3,p4,p5,q} with edge set {p1p2,p2p3,p3p4,p4p5,p3q}. Thus p1p2p3p4p5 is a five-vertex path and q is a leaf attached to its middle vertex p3. The co-E graph is the complement of this graph.

[F5]

The E overlap blockade and mixed quotient sequence supplies the following definition: Fix a comb block Bi with nonempty E overlap support Xi. By lem-e-overlap-classes-form-an-anticonnected-partition, its overlap classes are nonempty anticonnected sets partitioning Xi. Fix an enumeration of the finite set Bi, and order the classes by their least enumerated vertex to obtain L1. Define recursively Ls+1=Ls/M for s1, using def-quotient-blockade-by-mixed-block-reachability and its least-member ordering. Thus one replaces each mixed-reachability class of blocks by its union. This construction is used only when Xi.

Proof

Given: The graph, vertices, sets and hypotheses in the statement.

1.1

All terminal blocks are nonempty, pairwise pure, and unions of initial overlap classes. Suppose six distinct pattern vertices induce E. Choose one vertex in each corresponding block. The six choices are possible because each block is nonempty, and the chosen vertices are distinct because the blocks are disjoint.

F1given
1.2

By the definition of the pattern, complete block pairs supply edges between the representatives; nonadjacent pattern pairs, being pure and not complete, are anticomplete. Thus all fifteen pairs of representatives have exactly the adjacency of E, including its ten nonedges.

F3F4
2.1

These six vertices form an induced E inside Bi, so every pair has an overlap chain of length one and they all belong to a single overlap class. That class is one block of L1, and coarsening places it in a single terminal block, contradicting the six distinct chosen blocks. If the pattern has fewer than six vertices the prohibited selection is already impossible.

F2F5F1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources