How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Wonderful finite graph families
Definition
Let be a finite family of finite graphs, and write
for its family of complements (Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements).
We say that is wonderful if there exists a real constant such that the following holds for every and every -free graph (-free and -free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention).
Suppose that is an -blockade in (Blockades, their length, their width, and their support) with , that all blocks have the same size, that every block is anticonnected (Anticonnected graphs and anticonnected components), and that for every distinct either
- is complete to (Edges between disjoint vertex sets; complete, anticomplete, pure and mixed pairs), or
- is -sparse to and is -sparse to (Sparsity of one vertex set to another, and weak sparsity of a pair).
Then at least one of the following conclusions holds:
- has a -restricted induced subgraph of size at least (-sparse, -dense and -restricted vertex sets).
- There exists such that at most vertices satisfy
This item fixes the symmetric reading of the source phrase "complete or -sparse" that the later proof actually uses: when a pair of blocks is not complete, each block is sparse to the other.
Depends on
- Anticonnected graphs and anticonnected components
- Blockades, their length, their width, and their support
- $c$-sparse, $c$-dense and $c$-restricted vertex sets
- Sparsity of one vertex set to another, and weak sparsity of a pair
- Edges between disjoint vertex sets; complete, anticomplete, pure and mixed pairs
- Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements
- $H$-free and $\mathcal F$-free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, Section 2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)