How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every induced subgraph of an -free graph is -free
Statement
If is -free and is an induced subgraph of , then is -free.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An -free graph and an induced embedding .
-free means that no has an induced embedding into (-free and -free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention).
Induced embeddings compose (Induced embeddings compose, and the induced-subgraph relation is transitive up to isomorphism).
Proof
Suppose is not -free. Then some has an induced embedding .
The composite is an induced embedding.
This contradicts that is -free. Hence is -free.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 13 results over 8 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Valerio Boncompagni, On hereditary graph classes defined by forbidding Truemper configurations (PhD thesis, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)