How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Induced embeddings compose, and the induced-subgraph relation is transitive up to isomorphism
Statement
If and , then . Consequently, being an induced subgraph up to isomorphism is transitive.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Induced embeddings and .
An induced embedding is injective and preserves adjacency in both directions (Induced embeddings and induced copies of a graph).
A composite of injections is injective (Injection, surjection, bijection).
Graph isomorphism is compatible with composition (Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements).
Proof
The composite is injective.
For distinct , one has if and only if , if and only if .
Hence is an induced embedding. Replacing induced copies by their isomorphic representatives gives the stated transitivity up to isomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Valerio Boncompagni, On hereditary graph classes defined by forbidding Truemper configurations (PhD thesis, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)