How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
is -free if and only if is -free
Statement
For finite graphs and ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Finite graphs and .
-free means containing no induced copy of (-free and -free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention).
Complementation commutes with induced subgraphs ( for every vertex set ).
Complementation carries isomorphisms to isomorphisms (Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements).
Proof
For every , one has if and only if .
Thus contains an induced if and only if contains an induced . Negating both sides gives the claimed equivalence.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 13 results over 8 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Valerio Boncompagni, On hereditary graph classes defined by forbidding Truemper configurations (PhD thesis, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)
- ISGCI, Self-complementary classes (standard reference, not scraped)