Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An induced subgraph of a prime graph need not be prime

Statement refuted

Every induced subgraph of a prime graph is prime.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The five-vertex path P5 with vertices 0,1,2,3,4 in order.

Counterexample

technique · constructive
1.1

By [L1], the graph P5 is prime.

L1construct
1.2

Deleting the middle vertex 2 leaves the induced subgraph on {0,1,3,4}, which is the disjoint union of the two edges 01 and 34.

givenconstruct
2.1

In that four-vertex induced subgraph, the set {0,1} is a proper module of size two, since every outside vertex is anticomplete to it. So [L2] shows that the induced subgraph is not prime.

step 1.2L2
3.1

Hence a prime graph can have an induced subgraph that is not prime.

step 1.1step 2.1discharge-construct

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.