How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Two disjoint modules whose union is not a module
Statement refuted
If and are disjoint modules of a graph, then is a module.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The path with vertices in order, together with the two sets and .
Singletons are trivial modules (Modules of a graph, and the trivial modules).
In the path , the vertices are adjacent exactly along the edges , , and (Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
Counterexample
The sets and are disjoint.
By [L1], both and are modules of .
The vertex lies outside , is adjacent to , and is not adjacent to by [L2], so it splits . Hence is not a module.
Thus with and is a counterexample to the claim.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.