How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The five-cycle is bull-free but not perfect
Statement refuted
Every bull-free graph is perfect.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The cycle graph .
The bull contains a triangle (The bull graph, A bull-free graph).
The graph is the five-vertex cycle (Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
A graph is perfect when every induced subgraph satisfies (A perfect graph).
Counterexample
The graph is triangle-free by [F2], whereas every bull contains a triangle by [F1]. So contains no induced bull and is bull-free.
In , the largest clique has size , while a proper vertex colouring needs colours. Hence , so [F3] shows that is not perfect.
Therefore is a bull-free graph that is not perfect, refuting the claim.
Depends on
Used by
- The five-cycle is 2-narrow but not 1-narrow Example
- FALSE: every bull-free graph is perfect False statement
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Maria Chudnovsky and Shmuel Safra, The Erdős-Hajnal conjecture for bull-free graphs, Sections 1-2 (standard reference, not scraped)