Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The class of connected graphs is not hereditary

Statement refuted

The class of connected finite graphs is hereditary.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The path P3=v0v1v2.

[F2]

The induced subgraph on {v0,v2} has no edge (Subgraphs, induced subgraphs and spanning subgraphs).

[F3]

A hereditary class must contain every induced subgraph of each member (Hereditary graph classes).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1F1

The graph P3 belongs to the class of connected graphs.

1.2F2

Its induced subgraph on the endpoints is K‾2, which is disconnected.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2F3∎

Hence this class is not closed under induced subgraphs and is not hereditary.

Remarks

v0v1v2P3isconnectedinduceonfv0;v2gv0v2K2isdisconnected

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources