Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The class of connected graphs is not hereditary

Statement refuted

The class of connected finite graphs is hereditary.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The path P3=v0v1v2P_3=v_0v_1v_2.

[F2]

The induced subgraph on {v0,v2}\{v_0,v_2\} has no edge (Subgraphs, induced subgraphs and spanning subgraphs).

[F3]

A hereditary class must contain every induced subgraph of each member (Hereditary graph classes).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The graph P3P_3 belongs to the class of connected graphs.

F1
1.2

Its induced subgraph on the endpoints is K2\overline K_2, which is disconnected.

F2
2.1

Hence this class is not closed under induced subgraphs and is not hereditary.

step 1.1step 1.2F3

Remarks

v0v1v2P3isconnectedinduceonfv0;v2gv0v2K2isdisconnected

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 14 results over 7 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources