How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every nonempty hereditary graph class contains the null graph
Statement
Every nonempty hereditary class of finite graphs contains the null graph .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonempty hereditary graph class .
Choose .
The induced subgraph is the null graph (Subgraphs, induced subgraphs and spanning subgraphs, Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
A hereditary class contains every induced subgraph of each member (Hereditary graph classes).
Proof
Since , heredity gives .
Since , the null graph belongs to .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 12 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Valerio Boncompagni, On hereditary graph classes defined by forbidding Truemper configurations (PhD thesis, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)