How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
contains as a subgraph but not as an induced subgraph
Statement refuted
Every ordinary subgraph copy of in is an induced copy.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The graphs and .
Deleting one edge from leaves a spanning subgraph isomorphic to (Subgraphs, induced subgraphs and spanning subgraphs, Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
An induced embedding must preserve both adjacency and nonadjacency (Induced embeddings and induced copies of a graph).
Counterexample
By deleting one triangle edge, contains an ordinary subgraph copy of .
Any injection from the three vertices of to the three vertices of is bijective, but the two endpoints of are nonadjacent while their images in are adjacent.
Thus contains no induced , despite containing an ordinary subgraph copy.
Remarks
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 13 results over 7 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Reinhard Diestel, Graph Theory, Preview Chapter 1 (standard reference, not scraped)