Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

K3K_3 contains P3P_3 as a subgraph but not as an induced subgraph

Statement refuted

Every ordinary subgraph copy of HH in GG is an induced copy.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The graphs P3P_3 and K3K_3.

[F2]

An induced embedding must preserve both adjacency and nonadjacency (Induced embeddings and induced copies of a graph).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

By deleting one triangle edge, K3K_3 contains an ordinary subgraph copy of P3P_3.

F1
1.2

Any injection from the three vertices of P3P_3 to the three vertices of K3K_3 is bijective, but the two endpoints of P3P_3 are nonadjacent while their images in K3K_3 are adjacent.

F2
2.1

Thus K3K_3 contains no induced P3P_3, despite containing an ordinary subgraph copy.

step 1.1step 1.2

Remarks

012K3delete02012deletedanordinaryP3subgraphnotinduced

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 13 results over 7 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources