Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every hereditary graph class is closed under taking arbitrary subgraphs

False Statement

Every hereditary graph class is closed under taking arbitrary, not necessarily induced, subgraphs.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hereditary class K\mathcal K of complete graphs.

[L2]

K3K_3 contains P3P_3 as an ordinary subgraph but not as an induced subgraph (K3K_3 contains P3P_3 as a subgraph but not as an induced subgraph).

[F1]

Heredity requires closure under induced subgraphs, not arbitrary edge-deleted subgraphs (Hereditary graph classes).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

The graph K3K_3 belongs to K\mathcal K.

L1
1.2

Deleting one edge gives an ordinary subgraph P3P_3, which is not complete and hence does not belong to K\mathcal K.

L2
2.1

Therefore the hereditary class K\mathcal K is not closed under arbitrary subgraphs.

step 1.1step 1.2F1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 19 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources