How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complementary hereditary classes have complementary forbidden bases
Statement
The class of edgeless graphs is complementary to the class of complete graphs, and their minimal forbidden bases and are complementary.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The classes of complete graphs and of edgeless graphs.
Complementation complements the minimal basis of a hereditary class (Complementation preserves hereditary classes and complements their minimal forbidden bases).
A graph belongs to the complement class of exactly when its complement belongs to .
Verification
Complementing a complete graph gives an edgeless graph and vice versa, so .
The two basis graphs satisfy .
Thus the displayed bases are complementary, exactly as the general theorem predicts.
Remarks
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 21 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Valerio Boncompagni, On hereditary graph classes defined by forbidding Truemper configurations (PhD thesis, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)
- ISGCI, Self-complementary classes (standard reference, not scraped)