How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Edgeless graphs form the hereditary class with forbidden basis
Statement
The class of finite edgeless graphs is hereditary, and its minimal forbidden induced-subgraph basis is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The class of finite edgeless graphs.
Complete graphs have minimal forbidden basis (Complete graphs form the hereditary class with forbidden basis ).
Complementation preserves hereditary classes and complements their minimal forbidden bases (Complementation preserves hereditary classes and complements their minimal forbidden bases).
Complements of complete graphs are edgeless, and (Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
Verification
The class is the complement class of the complete graphs.
Therefore it is hereditary and its basis is obtained by complementing .
That complement is , so the basis is .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 21 results over 8 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Valerio Boncompagni, On hereditary graph classes defined by forbidding Truemper configurations (PhD thesis, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)
- ISGCI, Self-complementary classes (standard reference, not scraped)