How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
under the induced-embedding convention
Statement
For every finite simple graph ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite simple graph .
counts induced embeddings of the two labelled vertices of into (The induced-embedding count , Induced embeddings and induced copies of a graph).
The sum of vertex degrees is (Handshake lemma: the sum of the vertex degrees is twice the number of edges).
Verification
An induced embedding of is exactly an ordered adjacent pair of vertices of .
Counting ordered adjacent pairs by their first vertex gives .
By the handshake lemma this is , proving the formula.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Swastik Kopparty, Local Structure: Subgraph Counts I (standard reference, not scraped)