Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complementation swaps cliques with stable sets, so ω(G)=α(G)\omega(\overline G)=\alpha(G)

Statement

For every finite graph GG, a vertex set is a clique in GG if and only if it is a stable set in G\overline G. Consequently,

ω(G)=α(G),α(G)=ω(G).\omega(\overline G)=\alpha(G),\qquad \alpha(\overline G)=\omega(G).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite graph GG and XV(G)X\subseteq V(G).

[F1]

A clique has all possible edges among its vertices, while a stable set has none (Cliques, stable sets, the clique number ω(G)\omega(G) and stability number α(G)\alpha(G)).

[F2]

Distinct vertices are adjacent in G\overline G exactly when they are nonadjacent in GG (Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Every pair of distinct vertices in XX is adjacent in GG if and only if no such pair is adjacent in G\overline G.

F2
2.1

Thus XX is a clique in GG if and only if it is stable in G\overline G, and symmetrically XX is stable in GG if and only if it is a clique in G\overline G.

step 1.1F1
3.1

The same vertex sets occur in the paired maximizations and retain their cardinalities, so the two displayed equalities follow.

step 2.1F1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 33 results over 13 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources