How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complementation swaps cliques with stable sets, so
Statement
For every finite graph , a vertex set is a clique in if and only if it is a stable set in . Consequently,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite graph and .
A clique has all possible edges among its vertices, while a stable set has none (Cliques, stable sets, the clique number and stability number ).
Distinct vertices are adjacent in exactly when they are nonadjacent in (Graph isomorphisms, automorphisms and graph complements).
Proof
Every pair of distinct vertices in is adjacent in if and only if no such pair is adjacent in .
Thus is a clique in if and only if it is stable in , and symmetrically is stable in if and only if it is a clique in .
The same vertex sets occur in the paired maximizations and retain their cardinalities, so the two displayed equalities follow.
Depends on
Used by
- A c-sparse set X satisfies α(G[X])≥|X|/(c|X|+1), and a c-dense set satisfies ω(G[X])≥|X|/(c|X|+1) Corollary
- The polynomial Rödl property implies the Erdős–Hajnal property Corollary
- A large epsilon-restricted induced subgraph gives a polynomial clique or stable set Example
- Large induced subgraphs without a polynomial clique or stable set force complete or anticomplete blockades Lemma
- A hereditary class has the Erdős–Hajnal property exactly when its complementary class does, with the same constants Proposition
- Every finite family with the Erdős–Hajnal property is viral Theorem
- Every H-free graph has a homogeneous set of size at least 2^c√log₂ n Theorem
- Every H-free graph has a homogeneous set of size at least 2^c√log₂ n log₂ log₂ n Theorem
- Leaf-reducible wonderful generalized nice finite families have the Erdős-Hajnal property Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Reinhard Diestel, Graph Theory, Preview Chapter 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Valerio Boncompagni, On hereditary graph classes defined by forbidding Truemper configurations (PhD thesis, 2018) (standard reference, not scraped)
- ISGCI, Self-complementary classes (standard reference, not scraped)