How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every -free graph has a homogeneous set of size at least
Statement
Let be a finite graph. Then there exists a constant such that every nonnull finite -free graph with satisfies Equivalently, has a clique or a stable set of size at least .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite graph , a nonnull finite -free graph , and .
The homogeneous number is (Homogeneous vertex sets and the homogeneous number ).
Fox-Sudakov quantitative density: there exists such that for every real with there is with and one of and has at most edges (Fox–Sudakov: a quantitative density form of Rödl's theorem ‡).
If a nonempty vertex set satisfies , then some has and is -sparse (A set of self-density at most has a subset of at least half its size that is -sparse).
A nonempty set is -sparse exactly when every vertex of has degree at most (A set is -sparse exactly when the maximum degree of the graph it induces is at most times its size).
Every nonnull finite graph satisfies (The greedy colouring bound for every nonnull finite graph).
Every finite graph satisfies (The bounds and ).
A vertex set is a clique in if and only if it is a stable set in (Complementation swaps cliques with stable sets, so ).
For nonempty , the self-density is (Edge counts and densities between nonempty vertex sets).
Proof
By [L2], choose a constant . Write and set . Since , one has , so .
Because , [L2] gives a set with , and one of and has at most edges. For that chosen graph on vertex set , [L8] gives .
If , then [L3] gives with and -sparse in . By [L4] every vertex of has degree at most , so [L5] gives , and then [L6] yields .
If , then [L3] gives with and -sparse in . Applying [L4], [L5], and [L6] inside the complement shows that has a stable set of size at least , and [L7] turns that stable set into a clique of the same size in .
Steps 3.1 and 3.2 show that has a homogeneous set with for some satisfying .
Because , choose so that whenever . For such , step 4.1 gives , hence , so .
Set . Choose so that whenever . Then step 5.1 gives for all . Shrinking if necessary handles the finitely many integers , because every nonnull graph has .
Therefore every nonnull finite -free graph with satisfies .
Depends on
- Fox–Sudakov: a quantitative density form of Rödl's theorem
- Homogeneous vertex sets and the homogeneous number $\operatorname{hom}(G)=\max\{\omega(G),\alpha(G)\}$
- A set of self-density at most $c$ has a subset of at least half its size that is $4c$-sparse
- A set is $c$-sparse exactly when the maximum degree of the graph it induces is at most $c$ times its size
- The greedy colouring bound $\chi(G)\leq\Delta(G)+1$ for every nonnull finite graph
- The bounds $\omega(G)\leq\chi(G)$ and $|V(G)|\leq\chi(G)\alpha(G)$
- Complementation swaps cliques with stable sets, so $\omega(\overline G)=\alpha(G)$
- The logarithm to a positive base other than one
- Edge counts and densities between nonempty vertex sets
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Maria Chudnovsky, The Erdős-Hajnal Conjecture: A Survey, sec. 1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Matija Bucić, Tung Nguyen, Alex Scott, and Paul Seymour, Induced subgraph density. I. A loglog step towards Erdős-Hajnal, Theorem 1.2 (standard reference, not scraped)