How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Classical and Log-Log Erdős–Hajnal Bounds
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Blockades, Combs and Pattern Graphs
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Countability and Uncountability
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Graph Colouring
- Graphs, Walks and Connectivity
- Inclusion–Exclusion, the Pigeonhole Principle and Double Counting
- Induced Subgraphs and Hereditary Graph Classes
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Metric Spaces
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Quantitative Induced Density and the Log-Log Step
- Regular Pairs and Induced Counting
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sparse Restricted Subgraphs and the Rödl–Nikiforov Theorems
- Suprema and Infima
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Erdős–Hajnal Property and Homogeneous Sets
- The Exponential Function
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
Homogeneous sets, sparse induced subgraphs, greedy colouring, the product bound , complementation, and base- logarithms are the ingredients behind the quantitative Erdős–Hajnal estimates. The page uses them in one fixed order: a density theorem isolates a large induced subgraph with few edges or few nonedges, trimming turns low density into bounded degree, colouring extracts a large stable set, and the complement turns the same argument into a clique bound.
The two density bounds proved earlier on
quantitative-induced-density-and-the-loglog-step supply the classical
and improved
scales. This page derives the corresponding
homogeneous-set lower bounds for -free graphs. A final corollary compares
the two exponents and shows that
the log-log scale eventually dominates every fixed classical scale.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
Every -free graph has a homogeneous set of size at least
Statement
Let be a finite graph. Then there exists a constant such that every nonnull finite -free graph with satisfies Equivalently, has a clique or a stable set of size at least .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite graph , a nonnull finite -free graph , and .
The homogeneous number is (Homogeneous vertex sets and the homogeneous number ).
For nonempty , the proved quantitative induced-density corollary supplies such that every -free and every have a nonempty with and at most edges in or (Fox sudakov quantitative induced density bound).
A graph is -free if it has no induced copy of (-free and -free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention).
If a nonempty vertex set satisfies , then some has and is -sparse (A set of self-density at most has a subset of at least half its size that is -sparse).
A nonempty set is -sparse exactly when every vertex of has degree at most (A set is -sparse exactly when the maximum degree of the graph it induces is at most times its size).
Every nonnull finite graph satisfies (The greedy colouring bound for every nonnull finite graph).
Every finite graph satisfies (The bounds and ).
A vertex set is a clique in if and only if it is a stable set in (Complementation swaps cliques with stable sets, so ).
For nonempty , the self-density is (Edge counts and densities between nonempty vertex sets).
Proof
If is null, every graph has the empty induced copy, so no graph in the stated range is -free and the assertion is vacuous. Hence assume is nonempty. By [L2], choose . Write and set . Choose so large that whenever . For these one has , as required to apply [L2]. The finitely many smaller are handled after the large- argument.
For , because , [L2] gives a set with , and one of and has at most edges. For that chosen graph on vertex set , [L8] gives .
If , then [L3] gives with and -sparse in . By [L4] every vertex of has degree at most , so [L5] gives , and then [L6] yields .
If , then [L3] gives with and -sparse in . Applying [L4], [L5], and [L6] inside the complement shows that has a stable set of size at least , and [L7] turns that stable set into a clique of the same size in .
Steps 3.1 and 3.2 show that has a homogeneous set with for some satisfying .
Because , choose so that whenever . For such , step 4.1 gives , hence , so .
Set . Choose so that whenever . Then step 5.1 gives for all . For the finitely many integers , every graph on at least two vertices has either an adjacent pair or a nonadjacent pair, so . Shrink if necessary so that for each of these .
Therefore every nonnull finite -free graph with satisfies .
Every -free graph has a homogeneous set of size at least
Statement
Let be a finite graph. Then there exists a constant such that every nonnull finite -free graph with satisfies
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite graph , a nonnull finite -free graph , and .
The homogeneous number is (Homogeneous vertex sets and the homogeneous number ).
For nonempty , the proved quantitative induced-density theorem supplies such that every -free and every have a nonempty with and at most edges in or (Loglog quantitative induced density bound).
A graph is -free if it has no induced copy of (-free and -free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention).
If a nonempty vertex set satisfies , then some has and is -sparse (A set of self-density at most has a subset of at least half its size that is -sparse).
A nonempty set is -sparse exactly when every vertex of has degree at most (A set is -sparse exactly when the maximum degree of the graph it induces is at most times its size).
Every nonnull finite graph satisfies (The greedy colouring bound for every nonnull finite graph).
Every finite graph satisfies (The bounds and ).
A vertex set is a clique in if and only if it is a stable set in (Complementation swaps cliques with stable sets, so ).
For nonempty , the self-density is (Edge counts and densities between nonempty vertex sets).
Proof
If is null, every graph has the empty induced copy, so the stated -free case is vacuous. Hence assume nonempty and choose from [L2]. Every graph on at least two vertices has an adjacent or nonadjacent pair, so ; this handles finitely many small after shrinking the final positive constant (and the target is at ). For the large- argument assume . Set and . Then once is sufficiently large.
For large enough , the inequality holds, so . Therefore . Using [L2], obtain with , and one of and has at most edges. For that chosen graph on vertex set , [L8] gives .
If , then [L3] gives with and -sparse in . By [L4], [L5], and [L6], .
If , then the same argument inside the complement produces a stable set of of size at least for some with , and [L7] turns it into a clique of .
Steps 3.1 and 3.2 show that has a homogeneous set with for some satisfying .
Because , choose a threshold so that whenever . For those , step 4.1 gives , hence , and therefore .
Set . For all sufficiently large , the inequality holds, so step 5.1 gives . For each of the finitely many smaller integers , the pair argument of step 1.1 gives ; shrink so that for all of them. At the displayed target is .
Hence every nonnull finite -free graph with satisfies .
For fixed , the log-log scale eventually exceeds every classical scale
Statement
Let . Then there exists such that for every integer , In particular, for each fixed finite graph , the log-log lower bound of Every -free graph has a homogeneous set of size at least eventually exceeds every classical scale .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Positive reals .
For , is defined (The logarithm to a positive base other than one).
Proof
For every integer , one has .
Choose so that whenever . This is possible because tends to with .
For every , step 2.1 gives , and exponentiating base preserves the inequality.
This proves the displayed eventual inequality, and the final sentence is its application with the constant supplied by Every -free graph has a homogeneous set of size at least .
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- Maria Chudnovsky, The Erdős-Hajnal Conjecture: A Survey, sec. 1
- Matija Bucić, Tung Nguyen, Alex Scott, and Paul Seymour, Induced subgraph density. I. A loglog step towards Erdős-Hajnal, Theorem 1.2
- Matija Bucić, Tung Nguyen, Alex Scott, and Paul Seymour, Induced subgraph density. I. A loglog step towards Erdős-Hajnal, Theorem 1.3
- Matija Bucić, Tung Nguyen, Alex Scott, and Paul Seymour, Induced subgraph density. I. A loglog step towards Erdős-Hajnal