Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 2 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full by a delegated reviewing agent on the owner's instruction; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Classical and Log-Log Erdős–Hajnal Bounds

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Homogeneous sets, sparse induced subgraphs, greedy colouring, the product bound ∣V∣≤χα, complementation, and base-2 logarithms are the ingredients behind the quantitative Erdős–Hajnal estimates. The page uses them in one fixed order: a density theorem isolates a large induced subgraph with few edges or few nonedges, trimming turns low density into bounded degree, colouring extracts a large stable set, and the complement turns the same argument into a clique bound.

The two density bounds proved earlier on quantitative-induced-density-and-the-loglog-step supply the classical log⁡2n and improved log⁡2n log⁡2log⁡2n scales. This page derives the corresponding homogeneous-set lower bounds for H-free graphs. A final corollary compares the two exponents and shows that the log-log scale eventually dominates every fixed classical scale.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Every H-free graph has a homogeneous set of size at least 2clog⁡2n

Statement

Let H be a finite graph. Then there exists a constant cH>0 such that every nonnull finite H-free graph G with n:=∣V(G)∣≥2 satisfies hom⁡(G)≥2cHlog⁡2n. Equivalently, G has a clique or a stable set of size at least 2cHlog⁡2n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite graph H, a nonnull finite H-free graph G, and n:=∣V(G)∣≥2.

[L1]

The homogeneous number is hom⁡(G)=max⁡{ω(G),α(G)} (Homogeneous vertex sets and the homogeneous number hom⁡(G)=max⁡{ω(G),α(G)}).

[L2]

For nonempty H, the proved quantitative induced-density corollary supplies CH>0 such that every H-free G and every 0<x<1/2 have a nonempty S⊆V(G) with ∣S∣≥2−CH(log⁡2(1/x))2n and at most x(∣S∣2) edges in G[S] or G‾[S] (Fox sudakov quantitative induced density bound).

[L9]

A graph is H-free if it has no induced copy of H (H-free and F-free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention).

[L3]

If a nonempty vertex set X satisfies dG(X,X)≤c, then some X′⊆X has ∣X′∣≥∣X∣/2 and is 4c-sparse (A set of self-density at most c has a subset of at least half its size that is 4c-sparse).

[L4]

A nonempty set X is c-sparse exactly when every vertex of G[X] has degree at most c∣X∣ (A set is c-sparse exactly when the maximum degree of the graph it induces is at most c times its size).

[L5]

Every nonnull finite graph F satisfies χ(F)≤Δ(F)+1 (The greedy colouring bound χ(G)≤Δ(G)+1 for every nonnull finite graph).

[L6]

Every finite graph F satisfies ∣V(F)∣≤χ(F)α(F) (The bounds ω(G)≤χ(G) and ∣V(G)∣≤χ(G)α(G)).

[L7]

A vertex set is a clique in G if and only if it is a stable set in G‾ (Complementation swaps cliques with stable sets, so ω(G‾)=α(G)).

[L8]

For nonempty X, the self-density is dG(X,X)=2∣E(G[X])∣/∣X∣2 (Edge counts and densities between nonempty vertex sets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L2L9choose

If H is null, every graph has the empty induced copy, so no graph in the stated range is H-free and the assertion is vacuous. Hence assume H is nonempty. By [L2], choose CH>0. Write L:=log⁡2n and set x:=2−L/(2CH). Choose N0 so large that L>2CH whenever n≥N0. For these n one has 0<x<1/2, as required to apply [L2]. The finitely many smaller n are handled after the large-n argument.

2.1step 1.1L2L8algebra

For n≥N0, because log⁡2(1/x)=L/(2CH), [L2] gives a set S⊆V(G) with ∣S∣≥2−CH(log⁡2(1/x))2n=2−L/2n=n, and one of G[S] and G‾[S] has at most x(∣S∣2) edges. For that chosen graph F on vertex set S, [L8] gives dF(S,S)=2∣E(F)∣/∣S∣2≤2x(∣S∣2)/∣S∣2=x(∣S∣−1)/∣S∣≤x.

3.1step 2.1L3L4L5L6

If F=G[S], then [L3] gives X⊆S with ∣X∣≥∣S∣/2 and X 4x-sparse in G. By [L4] every vertex of G[X] has degree at most 4x∣X∣, so [L5] gives χ(G[X])≤4x∣X∣+1, and then [L6] yields α(G[X])≥∣X∣/(4x∣X∣+1).

3.2step 2.1L3L4L5L6L7

If F=G‾[S], then [L3] gives X⊆S with ∣X∣≥∣S∣/2 and X 4x-sparse in G‾. Applying [L4], [L5], and [L6] inside the complement shows that G‾[X] has a stable set of size at least ∣X∣/(4x∣X∣+1), and [L7] turns that stable set into a clique of the same size in G[X].

4.1step 3.1step 3.2step 2.1L1

Steps 3.1 and 3.2 show that G has a homogeneous set Y with ∣Y∣≥∣X∣/(4x∣X∣+1) for some X⊆S satisfying ∣X∣≥∣S∣/2≥n/2.

5.1step 4.1step 1.1choosealgebra

Because xn=2L/2−L/(2CH), choose NH≥N0 so that xn≥1 whenever n≥NH. For such n, step 4.1 gives 4x∣X∣≥2, hence 4x∣X∣+1≤8x∣X∣, so ∣Y∣≥1/(8x)=2L/(2CH)−3.

6.1step 5.1L1choosealgebra

Set cH:=1/(42CH). Choose NH′≥NH so that L/(2CH)−3≥cHL whenever n≥NH′. Then step 5.1 gives ∣Y∣≥2cHL for all n≥NH′. For the finitely many integers 2≤n<NH′, every graph on at least two vertices has either an adjacent pair or a nonadjacent pair, so hom⁡(G)≥2. Shrink cH>0 if necessary so that 2cHlog⁡2n≤2 for each of these n.

7.1step 6.1L1∎

Therefore every nonnull finite H-free graph G with ∣V(G)∣=n≥2 satisfies hom⁡(G)≥2cHlog⁡2n.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)Open item page →

Every H-free graph has a homogeneous set of size at least 2clog⁡2n log⁡2log⁡2n

Statement

Let H be a finite graph. Then there exists a constant cH>0 such that every nonnull finite H-free graph G with n:=∣V(G)∣≥2 satisfies hom⁡(G)≥2cHlog⁡2n log⁡2log⁡2n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite graph H, a nonnull finite H-free graph G, and n:=∣V(G)∣≥2.

[L1]

The homogeneous number is hom⁡(G)=max⁡{ω(G),α(G)} (Homogeneous vertex sets and the homogeneous number hom⁡(G)=max⁡{ω(G),α(G)}).

[L2]

For nonempty H, the proved quantitative induced-density theorem supplies CH>0 such that every H-free G and every 0<x<1/2 have a nonempty S⊆V(G) with ∣S∣≥2−CH(log⁡2(1/x))2/log⁡2log⁡2(1/x)n and at most x(∣S∣2) edges in G[S] or G‾[S] (Loglog quantitative induced density bound).

[L9]

A graph is H-free if it has no induced copy of H (H-free and F-free graphs under the induced-subgraph convention).

[L3]

If a nonempty vertex set X satisfies dG(X,X)≤c, then some X′⊆X has ∣X′∣≥∣X∣/2 and is 4c-sparse (A set of self-density at most c has a subset of at least half its size that is 4c-sparse).

[L4]

A nonempty set X is c-sparse exactly when every vertex of G[X] has degree at most c∣X∣ (A set is c-sparse exactly when the maximum degree of the graph it induces is at most c times its size).

[L5]

Every nonnull finite graph F satisfies χ(F)≤Δ(F)+1 (The greedy colouring bound χ(G)≤Δ(G)+1 for every nonnull finite graph).

[L6]

Every finite graph F satisfies ∣V(F)∣≤χ(F)α(F) (The bounds ω(G)≤χ(G) and ∣V(G)∣≤χ(G)α(G)).

[L7]

A vertex set is a clique in G if and only if it is a stable set in G‾ (Complementation swaps cliques with stable sets, so ω(G‾)=α(G)).

[L8]

For nonempty X, the self-density is dG(X,X)=2∣E(G[X])∣/∣X∣2 (Edge counts and densities between nonempty vertex sets).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2L9choose

If H is null, every graph has the empty induced copy, so the stated H-free case is vacuous. Hence assume H nonempty and choose CH>0 from [L2]. Every graph on at least two vertices has an adjacent or nonadjacent pair, so hom⁡(G)≥2; this handles finitely many small n after shrinking the final positive constant (and the target is 1 at n=2). For the large-n argument assume L:=log⁡2n≥4. Set β:=1/(4CH) and x:=2−βLlog⁡2L. Then 0<x<1/2 once n is sufficiently large.

2.1step 1.1L2L8algebra

For large enough L, the inequality βLlog⁡2L≥L holds, so log⁡2log⁡2(1/x)=log⁡2(βLlog⁡2L)≥12log⁡2L. Therefore CH(log⁡2(1/x))2/log⁡2log⁡2(1/x)≤2CHβ2L=L/8. Using [L2], obtain S⊆V(G) with ∣S∣≥2−L/8n=27L/8≥n, and one of G[S] and G‾[S] has at most x(∣S∣2) edges. For that chosen graph F on vertex set S, [L8] gives dF(S,S)≤2x(∣S∣2)/∣S∣2=x(∣S∣−1)/∣S∣≤x.

3.1step 2.1L3L4L5L6

If F=G[S], then [L3] gives X⊆S with ∣X∣≥∣S∣/2 and X 4x-sparse in G. By [L4], [L5], and [L6], α(G[X])≥∣X∣/(4x∣X∣+1).

3.2step 2.1L3L4L5L6L7

If F=G‾[S], then the same argument inside the complement produces a stable set of G‾[X] of size at least ∣X∣/(4x∣X∣+1) for some X⊆S with ∣X∣≥∣S∣/2, and [L7] turns it into a clique of G[X].

4.1step 3.1step 3.2step 2.1L1

Steps 3.1 and 3.2 show that G has a homogeneous set Y with ∣Y∣≥∣X∣/(4x∣X∣+1) for some X⊆S satisfying ∣X∣≥∣S∣/2≥n/2.

5.1step 4.1step 1.1choosealgebra

Because xn=2L/2−βLlog⁡2L, choose a threshold NH≥2 so that xn≥1 whenever n≥NH. For those n, step 4.1 gives 4x∣X∣≥2, hence 4x∣X∣+1≤8x∣X∣, and therefore ∣Y∣≥1/(8x)=2βLlog⁡2L−3.

6.1step 1.1step 5.1L1choosealgebra

Set cH:=β/2. For all sufficiently large n, the inequality βLlog⁡2L−3≥cHLlog⁡2L holds, so step 5.1 gives ∣Y∣≥2cHLlog⁡2L. For each of the finitely many smaller integers n≥3, the pair argument of step 1.1 gives hom⁡(G)≥2; shrink cH>0 so that 2cHlog⁡2n log⁡2log⁡2n≤2 for all of them. At n=2 the displayed target is 1.

7.1step 6.1L1∎

Hence every nonnull finite H-free graph G with ∣V(G)∣=n≥2 satisfies hom⁡(G)≥2cHlog⁡2n log⁡2log⁡2n.

CorollaryStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-26Open item page →

For fixed H, the log-log scale eventually exceeds every classical scale 2clog⁡2n

Statement

Let a,b>0. Then there exists N≥2 such that for every integer n≥N, 2blog⁡2n log⁡2log⁡2n≥2alog⁡2n. In particular, for each fixed finite graph H, the log-log lower bound of Every H-free graph has a homogeneous set of size at least 2clog⁡2n log⁡2log⁡2n eventually exceeds every classical scale 2alog⁡2n.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Positive reals a,b.

[L1]

For n>1, log⁡2n is defined (The logarithm to a positive base other than one).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1algebra

For every integer n>2, one has log⁡2n log⁡2log⁡2n=log⁡2log⁡2n log⁡2n.

2.1step 1.1choose

Choose N≥4 so that blog⁡2log⁡2n≥a whenever n≥N. This is possible because log⁡2log⁡2n tends to +∞ with n.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

For every n≥N, step 2.1 gives blog⁡2n log⁡2log⁡2n≥alog⁡2n, and exponentiating base 2 preserves the inequality.

4.1step 3.1∎

This proves the displayed eventual inequality, and the final sentence is its application with the constant supplied by Every H-free graph has a homogeneous set of size at least 2clog⁡2n log⁡2log⁡2n.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources