Alphabeta Math
Session-authored (Fable 5 assisted)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

17 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 17 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

The Exponential Function

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Real power-series theory supplies convergence radii, compact-uniform convergence, termwise differentiation, and Cauchy products. Factorials, binomial coefficients, finite sums, and the Archimedean property provide the arithmetic needed to define and manipulate the exponential series over the real numbers.

The power series defines the exponential function and yields its addition law, positivity, derivative, monotonicity, limits, and range. Product limits, the normalized differential equation, the multiplicative functional equation, and Picard iteration are then identified with the same function. Factorial tail estimates give explicit bounds for ee and establish its irrationality, completing the comparison of these constructions without logarithms or arbitrary real powers.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The real exponential function and the number ee by a power series

Definition

For xRx\in\mathbb R, define exp(x):=n=0xnι(n!),e:=exp(1),\exp(x):=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{x^n}{\iota(n!)}, \qquad e:=\exp(1), provided by the all-real convergence proved in The exponential series converges absolutely for every real argument . Here n!Nn!\in\mathbb N is the factorial of The factorial n!n! and the falling factorial nkn^{\underline{k}}, defined by recursion in N\mathbb{N}, ι(n!)\iota(n!) is its nonzero real image (The canonical natural ι(n)=n1F\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F of a field, Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing), and powers and series are those of Integer powers ama^m and Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series.

This is a real power series centred at 00 (A real power series about a centre, its interval of convergence, and its radius in [0,+][0,+\infty]). No logarithm, irrational power, or differential equation enters the definition.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)Open item page →

The exponential series converges absolutely for every real argument

Statement

For every real xx, the series n0xn/ι(n!)\sum_{n\ge0}x^n/\iota(n!) converges absolutely. Its power-series radius is therefore ++\infty.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If x=0x=0, the series is 1+0+0+1+0+0+\cdots and converges absolutely. Hence assume x0x\ne0. Choose N1N\ge1 with ι(N)>2x\iota(N)>2|x|. For nNn\ge N, the absolute terms an=xn/ι(n!)a_n=|x|^n/\iota(n!) are positive and satisfy an+1/an=x/ι(n+1)<1/2a_{n+1}/a_n=|x|/\iota(n+1)<1/2.

L1L3choose
2.1

Thus aN+jaN2ja_{N+j}\le a_N2^{-j} by induction, and the tail is dominated by a convergent geometric series.

step 1.1L2
3.1

The zero case from step 1.1 and, when x0x\ne0, adding the finite initial segment to the convergent tail prove absolute convergence for arbitrary xx. Hence every nonnegative radius works and the radius is ++\infty.

step 1.1step 2.1L2
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The exponential addition formula exp(x+y)=exp(x)exp(y)\exp(x+y)=\exp(x)\exp(y)

Statement

For all real x,yx,y, exp(x+y)=exp(x)exp(y).\exp(x+y)=\exp(x)\exp(y).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: x,yRx,y\in\mathbb R.

[L1]

For fixed x,yx,y, the auxiliary power series n0xnzn/ι(n!)\sum_{n\ge0}x^nz^n/\iota(n!) and n0ynzn/ι(n!)\sum_{n\ge0}y^nz^n/\iota(n!) have infinite radius by The exponential series converges absolutely for every real argument. Inside their common radius, their product is the Cauchy product of their coefficients (Inside the common radius the product of two power-series sums is represented by the Cauchy product of their coefficients).

[L3]

For knk\le n, ι(nk)=ι(n!)/(ι(k!)ι((nk)!))\iota\binom nk=\iota(n!)/(\iota(k!)\iota((n-k)!)) ((nk)k!(nk)!=n!\binom{n}{k}\,k!\,(n-k)! = n! for knk \le n; hence (nk)k!=nk\binom{n}{k}\,k! = n^{\underline{k}}, the quotient n!/(k!(nk)!)n!/(k!(n-k)!) is a natural number, and (nk)=(nnk)\binom{n}{k} = \binom{n}{n-k}). Therefore 1/(ι(k!)ι((nk)!))=ι(nk)/ι(n!)1/(\iota(k!)\iota((n-k)!))=\iota\binom nk/\iota(n!), with all naturals read in R\mathbb R through The canonical natural ι(n)=n1F\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F of a field.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Apply [L1] at the auxiliary value z=1z=1. The coefficient of degree nn in the resulting Cauchy product for exp(x)exp(y)\exp(x)\exp(y) is k=0nxkynk/(ι(k!)ι((nk)!))\sum_{k=0}^n x^ky^{n-k}/(\iota(k!)\iota((n-k)!)).

L1given
2.1

Apply [L3] and [L2] to identify this finite sum with (x+y)n/ι(n!)(x+y)^n/\iota(n!).

step 1.1L2L3algebra
3.1

Summing over nn gives the exponential series at x+yx+y, hence the formula.

step 2.1L1
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)Open item page →

The exponential is positive and satisfies exp(x)=1/exp(x)\exp(-x)=1/\exp(x)

Statement

For every real xx, exp(x)>0\exp(x)>0 and exp(x)=1exp(x).\exp(-x)=\frac1{\exp(x)}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: xRx\in\mathbb R.

[L1]

exp(x+y)=exp(x)exp(y)\exp(x+y)=\exp(x)\exp(y) (The exponential addition formula exp(x+y)=exp(x)exp(y)\exp(x+y)=\exp(x)\exp(y)), and exp(0)=1\exp(0)=1 from The real exponential function and the number ee by a power series.

[L2]

Every nonzero square in an ordered field is positive (Squares of nonzero elements are positive).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Setting y=xy=-x in [L1] gives exp(x)exp(x)=1\exp(x)\exp(-x)=1, so both factors are nonzero.

L1algebra
2.1

Also exp(x)=exp(x/2)2\exp(x)=\exp(x/2)^2, so it is nonnegative; by step 1.1 and [L2] it is positive.

L1L2
3.1

Dividing the identity in step 1.1 by exp(x)\exp(x) gives the reciprocal formula.

step 1.1algebra
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The exponential function is smooth and (exp)=exp(\exp)'=\exp

Statement

The real exponential function is CC^\infty, and for every mNm\in\mathbb N, exp(m)=exp.\exp^{(m)}=\exp. In particular (exp)=exp(\exp)'=\exp.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Termwise differentiation gives (exp)(x)=n1ι(n)xn1/ι(n!)(\exp)'(x)=\sum_{n\ge1}\iota(n)x^{n-1}/\iota(n!).

L1L2
2.1

Reindex n=j+1n=j+1 and cancel ι(j+1)\iota(j+1) using the factorial recurrence. The series becomes j0xj/ι(j!)=exp(x)\sum_{j\ge0}x^j/\iota(j!)=\exp(x).

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

Smoothness follows from [L1] and the infinite radius; iterating step 2.1 gives every higher derivative.

step 2.1L1L2
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)Open item page →

The exponential function is strictly increasing

Statement

The exponential function is continuous and strictly increasing on R\mathbb R.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If x<yx<y, the mean value theorem gives exp(y)exp(x)=exp(c)(yx)\exp(y)-\exp(x)=\exp(c)(y-x) for some c(x,y)c\in(x,y).

L1L2
2.1

Both factors on the right are positive, so exp(y)>exp(x)\exp(y)>\exp(x). Continuity is the cited power-series conclusion.

step 1.1L1L2
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)Open item page →

The exponential tends to ++\infty at ++\infty and to 00 at -\infty

Statement

exp(x)+(x+),exp(x)0(x),\exp(x)\to+\infty\quad(x\to+\infty),\qquad \exp(x)\to0\quad(x\to-\infty), and the range of exp\exp is contained in (0,)(0,\infty) and is unbounded above with infimum 00.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exponential series.

[L1]

For x0x\ge0, every exponential-series term is nonnegative, so its sum dominates every partial sum and in particular exp(x)1+x\exp(x)\ge1+x (The real exponential function and the number ee by a power series, A series of nonnegative terms converges iff its partial sums are bounded, and then the sum is their supremum).

[L2]

exp(x)=1/exp(x)>0\exp(-x)=1/\exp(x)>0 (The exponential is positive and satisfies exp(x)=1/exp(x)\exp(-x)=1/\exp(x)).

[L3]

Finite and infinite limits of functions at infinity have the quantified definitions in Limits at ++\infty and -\infty, and infinite limits at a point.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Given a real MM, every x>max{0,M1}x>\max\{0,M-1\} satisfies exp(x)1+x>M\exp(x)\ge1+x>M. Hence exp(x)+\exp(x)\to+\infty.

L1L3
1.2

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose X>0X>0 with 1+X>1/ε1+X>1/\varepsilon. If x<Xx<-X, then x>X-x>X, so [L1] gives exp(x)1x>1+X>1/ε\exp(-x)\ge1-x>1+X>1/\varepsilon; [L2] yields 0<exp(x)<ε0<\exp(x)<\varepsilon.

L1L2choose
2.1

The range assertions follow from positivity and the two limit conclusions.

step 1.1step 1.2L2
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)Open item page →

The exponential is a continuous bijection from R\mathbb{R} onto (0,)(0,\infty)

Statement

exp:R(0,)\exp:\mathbb R\longrightarrow(0,\infty) is a bijection.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Strict increase gives injectivity.

L1
1.2

Given y>0y>0, [L2] provides a<ba<b with exp(a)<y<exp(b)\exp(a)<y<\exp(b). Applying [L3] on [a,b][a,b] gives cc with exp(c)=y\exp(c)=y.

L1L2L3choose
2.1

Positivity gives the stated codomain, and steps 1.1 and 1.2 give bijectivity.

step 1.1step 1.2L2
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at ++\infty

Statement

For every mNm\in\mathbb N and every real a>0a>0, xmexp(ax)0(x+).\frac{x^m}{\exp(ax)}\longrightarrow0\qquad(x\to+\infty).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: mNm\in\mathbb N and a>0a>0.

[L1]

Every term of the exponential series is nonnegative at a nonnegative argument (The real exponential function and the number ee by a power series).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For x>0x>0, retain term m+1m+1 of the series at axax: exp(ax)(ax)m+1/ι((m+1)!)\exp(ax)\ge (ax)^{m+1}/\iota((m+1)!).

L1given
2.1

Hence 0xm/exp(ax)ι((m+1)!)/(am+1x)0\le x^m/\exp(ax)\le \iota((m+1)!)/(a^{m+1}x).

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

The upper bound tends to 00, so the quotient tends to 00.

step 2.1L2
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The exponential is the unique solution of y=yy'=y with y(0)=1y(0)=1

Statement

If y:RRy:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R is differentiable, y=yy'=y, and y(0)=1y(0)=1, then y=expy=\exp.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A differentiable solution yy of the initial-value problem.

[L1]

exp=exp\exp'=\exp, exp(x)=1/exp(x)\exp(-x)=1/\exp(x), and the series definition gives exp(0)=1\exp(0)=1 (The exponential function is smooth and (exp)=exp(\exp)'=\exp, The exponential is positive and satisfies exp(x)=1/exp(x)\exp(-x)=1/\exp(x), The real exponential function and the number ee by a power series).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Define h(x)=y(x)exp(x)h(x)=y(x)\exp(-x). By [L1] and [L2], h(x)=y(x)exp(x)y(x)exp(x)=0h'(x)=y'(x)\exp(-x)-y(x)\exp(-x)=0.

givenL1L2
2.1

The differentiable function hh is continuous, so [L3] makes it constant; h(0)=y(0)exp(0)=1h(0)=y(0)\exp(0)=1.

step 1.1L1L3
3.1

Thus y(x)exp(x)=1y(x)\exp(-x)=1, and multiplying by exp(x)\exp(x) gives y(x)=exp(x)y(x)=\exp(x).

step 2.1L1algebra
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)Open item page →

Regular normalized multiplicative Cauchy equations characterize the exponential

Statement

The exponential function is the unique continuous F:R(0,)F:\mathbb R\to(0,\infty) satisfying F(x+y)=F(x)F(y)F(x+y)=F(x)F(y) and F(1)=eF(1)=e. It is also the unique function differentiable at 00 satisfying the functional equation, F(0)=1F(0)=1, and F(0)=1F'(0)=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A function FF satisfying one of the two normalizations.

Proof

technique · cases
1.1

Under continuity and F(1)=eF(1)=e, the equation gives F(n)=enF(n)=e^n, F(n)=enF(-n)=e^{-n}, and uniqueness of positive roots gives F(m/n)=em/nF(m/n)=e^{m/n} for rationals m/nm/n. Density and continuity then give F(x)=exp(x)F(x)=\exp(x) for every real xx.

assume-case continuousL1L2given
1.2

Under differentiability at 00, F(x+h)F(x)h=F(x)F(h)1h\frac{F(x+h)-F(x)}h=F(x)\frac{F(h)-1}h, so F(x)=F(x)F(0)=F(x)F'(x)=F(x)F'(0)=F(x). With F(0)=1F(0)=1, [L1] gives F=expF=\exp.

assume-case differentiablegivenL1algebra
2.1

The exponential itself satisfies both normalizations, so both uniqueness assertions follow.

step 1.1step 1.2L1cases-exhaustive
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

For fixed kk, (nk)/nk\binom{n}{k}/n^k tends to 1/k!1/k!

Statement

For each fixed kNk\in\mathbb N, ι(nk)ι(n)k1ι(k!)(n),\frac{\iota\binom nk}{\iota(n)^k}\longrightarrow\frac1{\iota(k!)} \qquad(n\to\infty), where the expression is read for nmax{1,k}n\ge\max\{1,k\}. For every such nn, one also has the uniform bound 0ι(nk)ι(n)k1ι(k!).0\le \frac{\iota\binom nk}{\iota(n)^k}\le\frac1{\iota(k!)}.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For nmax{1,k}n\ge\max\{1,k\}, ι(nk)/ι(n)k=ι(k!)1j<k(1ι(j)/ι(n))\iota\binom nk/\iota(n)^k=\iota(k!)^{-1}\prod_{j<k}(1-\iota(j)/\iota(n)).

L1givenalgebra
2.1

For j<knj<k\le n, strict increase and positivity give 0ι(j)/ι(n)<10\le\iota(j)/\iota(n)<1, so every factor in step 1.1 lies in (0,1](0,1]. Thus the finite product lies in [0,1][0,1], proving the displayed uniform bound.

step 1.1L2
3.1

For each of the finitely many j<kj<k, ι(j)/ι(n)0\iota(j)/\iota(n)\to0; finite-product limit algebra makes the product in step 1.1 tend to 11. Multiplication by the fixed factor 1/ι(k!)1/\iota(k!) yields the limit.

step 1.1L2
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)Open item page →

For every real xx, (1+x/n)nexpx(1+x/n)^n\to\exp x

Statement

For every real xx, limn(1+xι(n))n=exp(x),\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(1+\frac{x}{\iota(n)}\right)^n=\exp(x), with the sequence started after n>xn>|x|, so the base is positive.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real xx.

[L1]

The binomial theorem expands the product. For fixed kk, For fixed kk, (nk)/nk\binom{n}{k}/n^k tends to 1/k!1/k! gives both convergence of the scaled coefficient to 1/ι(k!)1/\iota(k!) and, whenever nmax{1,k}n\ge\max\{1,k\}, the bound 0ι(nk)/ι(n)k1/ι(k!)0\le\iota\binom nk/\iota(n)^k\le1/\iota(k!) (The binomial theorem in R\mathbb{R}: (x+y)n=k<n+1ι ⁣(nk)xkynk(x+y)^{n} = \sum_{k<n+1} \iota\!\binom{n}{k}\, x^{k} y^{\,n-k}).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For n>xn>|x|, the binomial theorem gives (1+x/ι(n))n=k=0n(ι(nk)/ι(n)k)xk(1+x/\iota(n))^n=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\bigl(\iota\binom nk/\iota(n)^k\bigr)x^k.

L1
1.2

Each fixed coefficient tends to 1/ι(k!)1/\iota(k!), while the uniform bound in [L1] holds for every term present in the sum.

L1
2.1

Given ε>0\varepsilon>0, choose KK so the absolute exponential tail after KK is below ε/3\varepsilon/3 using [L2]. The same coefficient bound controls the product tail uniformly in nn; for the finite head kKk\le K, choose nn so all coefficient errors sum to below ε/3\varepsilon/3.

step 1.2L2choose
3.1

The triangle inequality then makes the product differ from k0xk/ι(k!)=exp(x)\sum_{k\ge0}x^k/\iota(k!)=\exp(x) by less than ε\varepsilon.

step 1.1step 2.1given
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

Picard iteration from 11 produces the exponential partial sums

Statement

Define u0(x)=1u_0(x)=1 and ur+1(x)=1+0xur(t)dtu_{r+1}(x)=1+\int_0^x u_r(t)\,dt. Then ur(x)=k=0rxkι(k!)u_r(x)=\sum_{k=0}^{r}\frac{x^k}{\iota(k!)} and urexpu_r\to\exp uniformly on every bounded interval. Moreover, exp(x)=1+0xexp(t)dt,\exp(x)=1+\int_0^x\exp(t)\,dt, and differentiating this integral equation recovers exp=exp\exp' = \exp and exp(0)=1\exp(0)=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

At r=0r=0, u0=1u_0=1, the stated finite sum.

basegiven
1.2

If the formula holds at rr, integrate its finite sum termwise from 00 to xx. By [L1], the integral of tk/ι(k!)t^k/\iota(k!) is xk+1/ι((k+1)!)x^{k+1}/\iota((k+1)!), giving the formula at r+1r+1.

ihL1given
2.1

Hence the iterates are precisely the partial sums of the exponential series. Its infinite radius and [L2] give uniform convergence on every bounded interval.

step 1.1step 1.2L2given
3.1

Fix xx and work on the compact interval with endpoints 00 and xx. The polynomial iterates are continuous and integrable there, and step 2.1 gives uniform convergence to exp\exp. Thus [L3] lets the integrals in ur+1(x)=1+0xur(t)dtu_{r+1}(x)=1+\int_0^x u_r(t)\,dt pass to the limit, giving exp(x)=1+0xexp(t)dt\exp(x)=1+\int_0^x\exp(t)\,dt, with the orientation supplied by The integral with oriented limits: aaf:=0\int_a^a f := 0 and baf:=abf\int_b^a f := -\int_a^b f when x<0x<0.

step 2.1L3given
4.1

Step 2.1 and [L3] make exp\exp continuous. The first fundamental theorem applied to step 3.1 gives exp(x)=exp(x)\exp'(x)=\exp(x), and setting x=0x=0 gives exp(0)=1\exp(0)=1.

step 2.1step 3.1L3discharge-induction
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The power-series, product-limit, IVP, functional-equation, and Picard definitions agree

Statement

The following descriptions give the same function R(0,)\mathbb R\to(0,\infty): the power series xn/ι(n!)\sum x^n/\iota(n!); the product limit limn(1+x/ι(n))n\lim_n(1+x/\iota(n))^n; the normalized solution of y=y, y(0)=1y'=y,\ y(0)=1; the normalized continuous multiplicative function; and the compact-uniform limit of the Picard iterates.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Each theorem in [L2] identifies its construction with the series-defined function in [L1], with exactly the normalization stated here.

L1L2
2.1

Equality with a common function is transitive, so all five descriptions are equivalent.

step 1.1algebra
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

A geometric bound for tails of the exponential series

Statement

If xRx\in\mathbb R, NNN\in\mathbb N, and ι(N+2)2x\iota(N+2)\ge2|x|, then k=N+1xkι(k!)2xN+1ι((N+1)!).\sum_{k=N+1}^{\infty}\frac{|x|^k}{\iota(k!)} \le \frac{2|x|^{N+1}}{\iota((N+1)!)}.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For kN+1k\ge N+1, strict increase gives ι(k+1)ι(N+2)2x\iota(k+1)\ge\iota(N+2)\ge2|x|, and the factorial recurrence gives that the ratio of consecutive absolute terms is x/ι(k+1)1/2|x|/\iota(k+1)\le1/2.

givenL1
2.1

Thus the jj-th term after N+1N+1 is at most the first tail term times 2j2^{-j}.

step 1.1induction
3.1

Sum the geometric majorant using [L2] to obtain the displayed bound.

step 2.1L2given
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The elementary numerical bound 2<e<32<e<3

Statement

2<e<3.2<e<3.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: e=k01/ι(k!)e=\sum_{k\ge0}1/\iota(k!) (The real exponential function and the number ee by a power series).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The first three terms give e>1+1+1/2>2e>1+1+1/2>2.

given
1.2

The term at index 22 is 1/21/2. Apply [L1] with x=1,N=2x=1,N=2: the tail from index 33 onward is at most 2/3!=1/32/3!=1/3. Thus the whole tail after index 11 is at most 1/2+1/3=5/6<11/2+1/3=5/6<1, and hence e<2+1=3e<2+1=3.

L1algebra
2.1

Combining the strict bounds gives the claim.

step 1.1step 1.2
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)Open item page →

The number ee is irrational

Statement

The number ee is irrational.

Facts & Assumptions

[L2]

The exponential factorial tail is bounded by A geometric bound for tails of the exponential series.

[L3]

Every rational has an integer representative p/qp/q with positive denominator; every positive integer is the image of a unique natural q1q\ge1. The embeddings NZQR\mathbb N\hookrightarrow\mathbb Z\hookrightarrow\mathbb Q\hookrightarrow\mathbb R are injective, preserve arithmetic and order, and the integers are closed under finite sums and differences (Every rational has a positive-denominator representative, The naturals embed in the integers, The integers embed in the rationals, The unique embedding of ℚ into an ordered field, The integers form a commutative ring).

Proof

technique · contradiction
1.1

Assume eQe\in\mathbb Q. By [L3], write e=p/qe=p/q in R\mathbb R with pZp\in\mathbb Z and qNq\in\mathbb N, q1q\ge1, using the canonical embeddings. Choose a natural nmax{q,2}n\ge\max\{q,2\} (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean).

assume-contraL3choose
2.1

Put A:=ι(n!)(ek=0n1/ι(k!))A:=\iota(n!)\left(e-\sum_{k=0}^{n}1/\iota(k!)\right). Every tail term is positive, so A>0A>0. Applying [L2] with x=1x=1 and N=nN=n, then using the factorial recurrence, gives A2ι(n!)ι((n+1)!)=2ι(n+1)23<1A\le \frac{2\iota(n!)}{\iota((n+1)!)} =\frac2{\iota(n+1)} \le\frac23<1 because n2n\ge2.

step 1.1L1L2algebra
3.1

The number AA from step 2.1 is an embedded integer. Indeed, for each 0kn0\le k\le n, [L1] gives a natural sks_k with n!=k!skn!=k!s_k. Also q!=m!qq!=m!q for the natural mm with q=m+1q=m+1, and [L1] at k=qk=q gives q!n!q!\mid n!; hence n!=qrn!=qr for some natural rr. By [L3] and multiplicativity of the embeddings, ι(n!)e=pr^,ι(n!)ι(k!)=ι(sk),\iota(n!)e=\widehat{pr},\qquad \frac{\iota(n!)}{\iota(k!)}=\iota(s_k), where pr^\widehat{pr} is the real image of the integer prpr. Therefore AA is a difference of embedded integers and is itself an embedded integer.

step 1.1L1L3algebra
4.1

Since the embedding preserves order, no embedded integer lies strictly between 00 and 11, contradicting steps 3.1 and 2.1. Therefore eQe\notin\mathbb Q.

step 3.1step 2.1L3discharge-contradiction
RemarkRemark: AI-generatedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The exponential roadmap and its circularity hazards

Remarks

The equivalence theorem The power-series, product-limit, IVP, functional-equation, and Picard definitions agree is an identification after independent proofs, not a list of mutually supporting definitions. The power series first defines exp\exp; the addition law is proved by an absolutely convergent Cauchy product; differentiation is then termwise. Only after those steps are the differential-equation and functional-equation characterizations invoked.

The bijection onto the positive reals (The exponential is a continuous bijection from R\mathbb{R} onto (0,)(0,\infty)), polynomial domination (The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at ++\infty), and irrationality of ee (The number ee is irrational) use no logarithm. Each result is therefore independent of an inverse function and of real exponentiation.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources