Alphabeta Math
Session-authored (Fable 5 assisted)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

6 results · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 5 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

The Exponential Function: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)verified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)Open item page →

The log-free product limit (12/n)nexp(2)(1-2/n)^n\to\exp(-2)

Example

Define a sequence (an)nN(a_n)_{n\in\mathbb N} by a0:=0,an:=(12ι(n))n(n1).a_0:=0,\qquad a_n:=\left(1-\frac2{\iota(n)}\right)^n\quad(n\ge1). Then ane2a_n\longrightarrow e^{-2}. The separate value at n=0n=0 avoids division by ι(0)=0\iota(0)=0; the finitely many remaining initial indices with nonpositive base do not affect the limit.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The sequence (an)(a_n) defined above.

[L1]

The product-limit theorem holds for every real input once n>xn>|x| (For every real xx, (1+x/n)nexpx(1+x/n)^n\to\exp x).

[L2]

Since e=exp(1)e=\exp(1), the addition and reciprocal formulas and the definition of negative integer powers give exp(2)=1/exp(2)=1/(exp(1)exp(1))=1/e2=e2>0\exp(-2)=1/\exp(2)=1/(\exp(1)\exp(1))=1/e^2=e^{-2}>0 (The real exponential function and the number ee by a power series, The exponential addition formula exp(x+y)=exp(x)exp(y)\exp(x+y)=\exp(x)\exp(y), The exponential is positive and satisfies exp(x)=1/exp(x)\exp(-x)=1/\exp(x), Integer powers ama^m).

[L3]

A sequence and any one of its tails have the same limit (Convergence depends only on the tail).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

For every n>2n>2, the base is positive and an=(12/ι(n))na_n=(1-2/\iota(n))^n, so [L1] applies at x=2x=-2 and gives anexp(2)a_n\to\exp(-2) on that tail.

L1
2.1

By [L3], the whole sequence has the same limit as the tail in step 1.1, and [L2] identifies that limit as e2>0e^{-2}>0.

step 1.1L2L3
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The convergence (1+x/n)nexpx(1+x/n)^n\to\exp x is not uniform on R\mathbb{R}

Statement refuted

The pointwise convergence (1+x/ι(n))nexp(x)(1+x/\iota(n))^n\to\exp(x) is uniform on all of R\mathbb R.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

At the moving point x=ι(n)x=\iota(n), hn(x)=2nh_n(x)=2^n, whereas exp(x)=en\exp(x)=e^n.

givenL2
2.1

Since e>2e>2, the difference en2ne^n-2^n is at least e2>0e-2>0 and in fact grows; therefore supxhn(x)exp(x)↛0\sup_x|h_n(x)-\exp(x)|\not\to0.

step 1.1L2algebra
3.1

Hence the pointwise convergence is not uniform on R\mathbb R.

step 2.1L1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

The one-sided flat function is CC^\infty with identically zero Taylor series

Example

Define ϕ(x)={exp(1/x),x>0,0,x0.\phi(x)=\begin{cases}\exp(-1/x),&x>0,\\0,&x\le0.\end{cases} Then ϕC(R)\phi\in C^\infty(\mathbb R) and ϕ(m)(0)=0\phi^{(m)}(0)=0 for every mNm\in\mathbb N, although ϕ(x)>0\phi(x)>0 for x>0x>0.

Facts & Assumptions

Verification

technique · induction
1.1

On x>0x>0, repeated product and chain rules give ϕ(m)(x)=Pm(1/x)exp(1/x)\phi^{(m)}(x)=P_m(1/x)\exp(-1/x) for a polynomial PmP_m; on x<0x<0, every derivative is 00.

baseL2L3given
2.1

If the formula holds at order mm, differentiating produces another polynomial Pm+1(1/x)P_{m+1}(1/x) times exp(1/x)\exp(-1/x). By [L1], this tends to 00 as x0+x\to0^+.

ihstep 1.1L1L2L3
3.1

The difference quotient for the mm-th derivative at 00 is again a polynomial in 1/x1/x times exp(1/x)\exp(-1/x), so it tends to 00. Induction therefore extends every derivative continuously across 00, with value 00.

step 2.1L1givendischarge-induction
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

A nonzero smooth compactly supported bump

Example

Let ϕ\phi be The one-sided flat function is CC^\infty with identically zero Taylor series and define b(x)=ϕ(1x2)b(x)=\phi(1-x^2). Then bb is smooth, positive on (1,1)(-1,1), and zero outside [1,1][-1,1]; its support is [1,1][-1,1].

Facts & Assumptions

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

On x<1|x|<1, 1x2>01-x^2>0, so b(x)>0b(x)>0; on x1|x|\ge1, 1x201-x^2\le0, so b(x)=0b(x)=0.

givenL1
1.2

Away from ±1\pm1, smoothness follows from [L2]. At ±1\pm1, every one-sided derivative from inside is a finite sum of derivatives of ϕ\phi at 00, all zero by [L1], matching the zero function outside.

L1L2
2.1

Thus bb is smooth and its nonzero set is (1,1)(-1,1), whose closure is [1,1][-1,1]; this is its support.

step 1.1step 1.2L3
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-01Open item page →

A discontinuous positive solution of F(x+y)=F(x)F(y)F(x+y)=F(x)F(y)

Statement refuted

Every positive F:R(0,)F:\mathbb R\to(0,\infty) satisfying F(x+y)=F(x)F(y)F(x+y)=F(x)F(y) is continuous and equals an ordinary exponential.

Facts & Assumptions

Counterexample

technique · constructive
1.1

Extend {1,b}\{1,b\} to a Hamel basis. Define the Q\mathbb Q-linear map AA by A(1)=1A(1)=1, A(b)=0A(b)=0, and A(v)=vA(v)=v on the remaining chosen basis elements. Then AA is additive but not the identity.

L1L2construct
2.1

Put F(x)=exp(A(x))F(x)=\exp(A(x)). Positivity and additivity give F(x+y)=F(x)F(y)F(x+y)=F(x)F(y), and F(1)=eF(1)=e.

step 1.1L3
3.1

If FF were continuous, Regular normalized multiplicative Cauchy equations characterize the exponential would give F=expF=\exp; injectivity of exp\exp would then give A(x)=xA(x)=x, contradicting A(b)=0bA(b)=0\ne b.

step 1.1step 2.1L3given
4.1

Thus FF is a discontinuous positive multiplicative solution. The construction uses Choice exactly in the basis extension.

step 3.1givendischarge-construct
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)Open item page →

The exponential is not uniformly continuous on R\mathbb{R}

Statement refuted

The exponential function is uniformly continuous on R\mathbb R.

Facts & Assumptions

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

For n1n\ge1, let xn=ι(n)x_n=\iota(n) and yn=ι(n)+1/ι(n)y_n=\iota(n)+1/\iota(n). Then ynxn=1/ι(n)0|y_n-x_n|=1/\iota(n)\to0.

L3
1.2

By the mean value theorem, exp(yn)exp(xn)=exp(cn)/ι(n)\exp(y_n)-\exp(x_n)=\exp(c_n)/\iota(n) for some cn(xn,yn)c_n\in(x_n,y_n). Since exponential is increasing, this is at least exp(ι(n))/ι(n)\exp(\iota(n))/\iota(n), which tends to ++\infty by [L2].

L2given
2.1

Thus arbitrarily close pairs have image distances bounded away from 00, contradicting the uniform-continuity condition [L1].

step 1.1step 1.2L1

Sources