How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Heine-Cantor in : a continuous real function on a compact subset of is uniformly continuous, proved -natively from sequential compactness
Statement
Let be compact (Open cover, subcover, compact subset of (every open cover has a finite subcover), and sequentially compact subset) and let be continuous on (Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point). Then is uniformly continuous on (Uniform continuity of : one serving every pair of points of ).
This theorem is stated twice in this library, on purpose. Its metric-space twin is Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous, proved there from the cover machinery of metric spaces; the proof below is -native and runs through A subset of is compact iff it is sequentially compact, which is order-based. That the two statements are the same statement in two vocabularies is Dictionary: for with the metric , continuity and uniform continuity of agree with the metric-space notions, the Lipschitz and Hölder conditions are the metric ones instantiated, and a subset of is compact in the open-cover sense of exactly when it is a compact metric subspace, clauses 1, 2 and 5, immediately above.
The choice cost, named. The proof invokes the axiom of countable choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()) exactly once, at step 3.1, to select one bad pair of points from each of countably many nonempty sets. The backward implication of A subset of is compact iff it is sequentially compact also spends countable choice, and that item names its own uses; the forward implication used here, from compact to sequentially compact, does not. No claim is made that the axiom is necessary for either.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A compact set and a function continuous on .
Uniform continuity on : for every real there is a real such that all with satisfy . Its negation: there is a real such that for every real some pair has and (Uniform continuity of : one serving every pair of points of , Ordered field).
A compact subset of is sequentially compact: every sequence with all terms in has a subsequence converging to a point of (A subset of is compact iff it is sequentially compact, Open cover, subcover, compact subset of (every open cover has a finite subcover), and sequentially compact subset, Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences, Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals).
Countable choice: for a family of nonempty sets there is a function on picking an element of each (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
A strictly increasing index map satisfies (A strictly increasing index map satisfies , Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences).
Archimedean property in reciprocal form: for every real there is a natural with ; and implies (For every in a complete ordered field there is a natural with , Every complete ordered field is Archimedean, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).
Sequential criterion, the choice-free direction: if is continuous at and has terms in with , then ( is continuous at if and only if for every sequence in converging to , the converse direction costing countable choice, Continuity of at a point of and on : the - condition, its agreement with at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point).
Triangle inequality and absolute value: , , (The triangle inequality, Basic properties of the absolute value).
Convergence of real sequences is tested at rational , and below every positive real lies a positive rational, so the test may equally be run at every real (Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals, The rationals embed densely in the reals).
Proof
Suppose is not uniformly continuous on . By [L1] fix a real such that for every real there are with and .
For put . Since , step 1.1 makes every nonempty.
By [L3] applied to the family fix a function with for every . This is the single use of countable choice in this proof.
is a sequence of reals with all terms in , so by [L2] there are a strictly increasing and with .
The second sequence converges to as well. Let a rational be given. By [L5] and [L8] fix with for every , and by step 4.1 fix with for every . For , using and from [L4], we get , hence by [L7]. So .
The point lies in and is continuous at , so [L6] applied to the two sequences of steps 4.1 and 5.1, both with terms in , gives and .
By [L8] fix a rational with , and by step 6.1 fix with and for every . For such , [L7] gives .
But gives for every , which contradicts step 7.1. The assumption of step 1.1 is therefore false, and is uniformly continuous on .
Remarks
-
Where compactness is used, and where continuity is used. Compactness is used once, in step 4.1, to extract a convergent subsequence; continuity is used once, in step 6.1, at the single point that the extraction produces. Neither can be weakened: on is continuous on a bounded non-closed set and not uniformly continuous ( is continuous on and not uniformly continuous there, the pairs and defeating every ↗), and on is continuous on a closed unbounded set and not uniformly continuous ( is continuous on and not uniformly continuous, the pairs and defeating every ↗).
-
The converse is sharp. For every noncompact that is bounded there is a continuous function on that is not uniformly continuous, and for every noncompact there is an unbounded continuous function and a bounded continuous one with no greatest value. That is Rudin 4.20, the sharp converse: on a noncompact there is an unbounded continuous function and a bounded continuous function with no greatest value, and if is bounded there is a continuous function on that is not uniformly continuous, later on this page, and together with this theorem it says that compactness is exactly the hypothesis these results need.
-
The pairs, not the points, are what is chosen. A common presentation selects two sequences separately and then extracts twice. Selecting the pair once, as above, keeps the count of choice applications at one and makes the second sequence's convergence a consequence rather than a second extraction.
Depends on
- Uniform continuity of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$: one $\delta$ serving every pair of points of $A$
- Continuity of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ at a point of $A$ and on $A$: the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ condition, its agreement with $\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c)$ at a limit point, and continuity at an isolated point
- Dictionary: for $A \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ with the metric $d(x,y) = |x-y|$, continuity and uniform continuity of $f : A \to \mathbb{R}$ agree with the metric-space notions, the Lipschitz and Hölder conditions are the metric ones instantiated, and a subset of $\mathbb{R}$ is compact in the open-cover sense of $\mathbb{R}$ exactly when it is a compact metric subspace
- $f$ is continuous at $c \in A$ if and only if $f(x_k) \to f(c)$ for every sequence in $A$ converging to $c$, the converse direction costing countable choice
- A subset of $\mathbb{R}$ is compact iff it is sequentially compact
- Open cover, subcover, compact subset of $\mathbb{R}$ (every open cover has a finite subcover), and sequentially compact subset
- Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals
- Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences
- A strictly increasing index map satisfies $n_k \ge k$
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- For every $\varepsilon > 0$ in a complete ordered field there is a natural $n \ge 1$ with $1/n < \varepsilon$
- Every complete ordered field is Archimedean
- Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order
- The triangle inequality
- Basic properties of the absolute value
- The rationals embed densely in the reals
- Ordered field
Used by
- The exponential is not uniformly continuous on ℝ Counterexample
- x ↦ 1/x is continuous on (0,1) and not uniformly continuous there, the pairs 1/(k+2) and 1/(k+3) defeating every δ Counterexample
- x ↦ x² is continuous on ℝ and not uniformly continuous, the pairs k+1 and k+1+1/(k+1) defeating every δ Counterexample
- FALSE: every continuous real function is uniformly continuous on its domain False statement
- What this page costs in choice: Riemann's criterion, the Darboux-Riemann equivalence and integrability of a monotone function are theorems of ZF; integrability of a continuous function inherits the single use of countable choice inside Heine-Cantor; and only the forward half of the Lebesgue criterion spends countable choice, once, at the countable union of null sets Remark
- A bounded function on [a,b] that is continuous except at finitely many points is Riemann integrable Theorem
- A bounded function with finitely many discontinuities is Stieltjes integrable against a continuous bounded-variation integrator Theorem
- A continuous function of a Stieltjes-integrable function is Stieltjes integrable for a nondecreasing integrator Theorem
- A continuous function on [a,b] is Riemann integrable, by Heine-Cantor and Riemann's criterion Theorem
- A continuous integrand is Riemann–Stieltjes integrable against every bounded-variation integrator Theorem
- A continuously differentiable integrator reduces Stieltjes integration to ordinary integration Theorem
- Change of variable for the Riemann–Stieltjes integral Theorem
- If f is integrable on [a,b] with values in [m,M] and φ is continuous on [m,M], then φ ∘ f is integrable Theorem
- Rudin 4.20, the sharp converse: on a noncompact E ⊆ ℝ there is an unbounded continuous function and a bounded continuous function with no greatest value, and if E is bounded there is a continuous function on E that is not uniformly continuous Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 138 results over 33 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Heine-Cantor theorem (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 4 (Thm 4.19) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, §3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- W. Trench, Introduction to Real Analysis, Ch. 8: Metric Spaces (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I, §3.3: Uniform continuity (standard reference, not scraped)