Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous

Statement

Let (X,dX) be a compact metric space (Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space), let (Y,dY) be any metric space (Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric) and let f:X→Y be continuous (Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the ε-δ form). Then f is uniformly continuous (Uniform continuity of a map of metric spaces: one δ serving every point).

No choice principle is used: the cover built below is cut out by a property, and the Lebesgue number lemma it is fed to is itself choice free (Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number: a δ>0 such that every nonempty subset of diameter less than δ lies inside a single member of the cover).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact metric space (X,dX), a metric space (Y,dY) and a continuous f:X→Y.

[L1]

f is continuous at a: for every real ε>0 there is a real δ>0 with f[BX(a,δ)]⊆BY(f(a),ε) (Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the ε-δ form, Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).

[L2]

f is uniformly continuous when for every real ε>0 there is a real δ>0 such that dX(x,x′)<δ implies dY(f(x),f(x′))<ε, for all x,x′∈X (Uniform continuity of a map of metric spaces: one δ serving every point).

[L3]

Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number: a real δ>0 such that every nonempty subset of diameter less than δ lies in a single member of the cover (Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number: a δ>0 such that every nonempty subset of diameter less than δ lies inside a single member of the cover, Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space).

[L5]

For nonempty bounded A, diam⁡(A)=sup⁡{dX(u,v):u,v∈A}; in particular diam⁡({x,x′})=dX(x,x′), the set of distances being {0,dX(x,x′)} and a metric being nonnegative (Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space, Nonnegativity of a metric is a consequence of the other axioms, not an axiom).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L2

If X=∅ the condition of uniform continuity holds vacuously, so assume X≠∅, and let ε>0 be real.

2.1L1step 1.1

Put U:={ U⊆X:U is open in X and f[U]⊆BY(z,ε/2) for some z∈Y }, a family cut out by a property and not by a selection.

3.1L1L4step 2.1

U is an open cover of X: given x∈X, continuity at x supplies a real δx>0 with f[BX(x,δx)]⊆BY(f(x),ε/2), and BX(x,δx) is open and contains x, so it belongs to U.

4.1L3step 3.1

By the Lebesgue number lemma there is a real δ>0 such that every nonempty subset of X of diameter less than δ is contained in a single member of U.

5.1L5step 2.1step 4.1

Let x,x′∈X with dX(x,x′)<δ; the set {x,x′} is nonempty with diameter dX(x,x′)<δ, so {x,x′}⊆U for some U∈U, and there is z∈Y with f[U]⊆BY(z,ε/2).

6.1L2L6step 5.1∎

Then dY(f(x),z)<ε/2 and dY(z,f(x′))<ε/2, so dY(f(x),f(x′))≤dY(f(x),z)+dY(z,f(x′))<ε; as ε>0 was arbitrary, f is uniformly continuous.

Remarks

The centre z is not chosen, and that is why the proof is choice free. The family U is defined by the existence of a suitable z, and the argument instantiates that existential once, at step 5.1, for the single member U that the Lebesgue number produced. No function assigning a centre to every member of U is ever needed.

Compactness is not removable. The map x↦1/x is continuous on the interval (0,1) and is not uniformly continuous there (x↦1/x is continuous on (0,1) and not uniformly continuous, so Heine-Cantor needs compactness of the domain); (0,1) is not compact.

The codomain is arbitrary. Nothing is assumed about (Y,dY) — not completeness, not boundedness, not compactness. All the work is done on the domain side, which is where the finite subcover lives.

Depends on

Used by

…and 63 more results.

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources