Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The de Rham homotopy formula extends to boundary manifolds

Statement

Let M,N be smooth manifolds, possibly with boundary. Suppose H:M×[0,1]N is smooth in the local coordinate-extension sense, including at both time endpoints and at boundary points of M. For a k-form ω on N, define, when k1, (LHω)x(v1,,vk1)=01(Hω)(x,t)(t,(v1,0),,(vk1,0))dt, and put LH=0 in degree zero and negative degrees. Then LHω is a smooth (k1)-form and H1H0=dLH+LHd. Here forms on the parameter product mean locally extendible coordinate forms; no general theory of manifolds with corners is invoked. In particular the endpoint pullbacks induce equal de Rham cohomology maps. The assertion is choice-free.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The de Rham complex and pullback extend to manifolds with boundary gives local-extension exterior calculus, its naturality and the quotient convention at a boundary.

[F2]

Integration along the unit interval for a differential form specifies the decomposition θ=αt+dtβt and the interval integral Kθ=01βtdt.

[F3]

Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral permits each parameter derivative through an integral with a continuous derivative integrand on a compact rectangle.

[F5]

The standard smooth step function supplies a smooth function s equal to zero for arguments at most zero and one for arguments at least one, with values in [0,1].

[F7]

Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous makes continuous coefficient derivatives uniformly continuous on compact rectangles.

Proof

Given: The homotopy H and a smooth form ω, with the local-extension convention in the statement.

1.1

At a point (x,t) choose source and target coordinates and local Euclidean extensions of the map and the finitely many form coefficients. Shrink the map domain so it lies in the domain of the extended coefficients. The ordinary Euclidean pullback then restricts to a locally extendible form θ=Hω on the parameter product. Derivatives are uniquely determined there: they agree on the dense set where the spatial half-space coordinate and the time coordinate are both interior, hence everywhere by continuity. The Euclidean formula for d and naturality restrict to this product just as in [F1], giving dθ=Hdω.

F1given
2.1

Fix a spatial chart point x0. Each coefficient of θ has smooth extensions on product neighbourhoods of (x0,t). There are finitely many coefficients; intersect their neighbourhoods at one t. Consider the family of all nested time intervals JI for which a coefficient extension exists on W×I for some Euclidean neighbourhood W of x0. These inner intervals cover [0,1], by the local extension property at each one time; no interval or extension is chosen as a function of time. By [F6], finitely many Ji cover [0,1]. For these finitely many members only, take corresponding Ii,Wi and extensions. For each, take numbers ai<bi<ci<di inside Ii with Ji[0,1][bi,ci] and put ρi(t)=s ⁣(taibiai)s ⁣(ditdici). It is one on [bi,ci], zero off [ai,di] and smooth by [F5]. Thus R=iρi is positive on an open neighbourhood J of [0,1]. Put ψi=ρi/R on J. Their sum is one and each is supported away from the endpoints of Ii.

F5F6step 1.1
3.1

On the finite intersection W=iWi, multiply the ith coefficient extension by ψi(t) and extend that product by zero outside Ii. Its support condition makes the extension smooth on W×J. Summing the finitely many products gives a smooth coefficient extension on W×J of the original coefficient on (WM)×[0,1], since every original coefficient equals each extension there and iψi=1. This construction is used only to prove local smoothness at the one point x0; it selects no families over all points of M.

step 2.1
4.1

Decompose θ=αt+dtβt as in [F2]. Integrate each extended coefficient of β from step 3.1 over [0,1]. On any smaller closed spatial rectangle in W, repeated use of [F3] gives xI01b(x,t)dt=01xIb(x,t)dt. Each right side is continuous: [F7] bounds its change by the uniform change of the integrand times the interval length. Thus these integrals define a smooth Euclidean extension near x0. A spatial coordinate change multiplies the coefficient vector of βt by an exterior-power transition matrix depending on x only; moving this finite matrix through the integral proves that the restrictions patch as a form. Consequently Kθ=LHω is well defined and smooth, including at M.

F2F3F7step 3.1
5.1

The coordinate formula of [F1], applied on the extensions and restricted back, gives dθ=dMαt+dt(tαtdMβt). The minus sign comes from moving dM past dt. By [F4], 01tαtdt=α1α0 coefficientwise. Step 4.1 also gives dMKθ=01dMβtdt. Therefore dMKθ+Kdθ=α1α0. Using dθ=Hdω from step 1.1 and αt=Htω, this is the asserted homotopy identity.

F1F2F4step 1.1step 4.1
6.1

For a closed form, step 5.1 says H1ωH0ω=d(LHω), so the endpoint classes agree in the quotient of [F1]. In degree zero β=0 and Kθ=0, while Kdθ is the integral of the time derivative; [F4] gives the same identity. In degree one LHω is an ordinary smooth function, including at the spatial boundary. Zero forms, negative degrees, constant homotopies and empty source or target cases satisfy the same formula with the appropriate zero spaces. Both time endpoints were included in steps 2.1–5.1. Only finitely many extensions at one specified point and explicit interval cutoffs were used, so no choice axiom is needed.

F1F4step 2.1step 4.1step 5.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources