Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative

Statement

Let a<b. Suppose G:[a,b]→R is continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b). If f:[a,b]→R is Riemann integrable and

f(x)=G′(x)(a<x<b),

then

∫abf=G(b)−G(a).

No derivative of G at either endpoint is assumed, and the two endpoint values assigned to the integrable extension f do not enter the conclusion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Reals a<b, a continuous G:[a,b]→R differentiable on (a,b), and an integrable f agreeing there with G′.

[L1]

If a function is continuous on [u,v] and differentiable on (u,v), then some ξ∈(u,v) satisfies G(v)−G(u)=G′(ξ)(v−u) (The mean value theorem, as the case g(x)=x of Cauchy's: for f continuous on [a,b] with a<b and differentiable on (a,b) there is c∈(a,b) with f(b)−f(a)=f′(c)(b−a)).

Proof

technique · squeeze
1.1

Fix a partition P=(t0,…,tm) of [a,b]. For each i<m, [L1] gives ξi∈(ti,ti+1) such that G(ti+1)−G(ti)=f(ξi)(ti+1−ti).

givenL1
2.1

If mi and Mi are the infimum and supremum of f on [ti,ti+1], then mi(ti+1−ti)≤G(ti+1)−G(ti)≤Mi(ti+1−ti).

step 1.1L2
3.1

Summing step 2.1 and telescoping the increments of G gives L(f,P)≤G(b)−G(a)≤U(f,P).

step 2.1L2
4.1

Taking the supremum of the lower sums and the infimum of the upper sums, which coincide because f is integrable, yields ∫abf=G(b)−G(a).

step 3.1L3
5.1

Every ξi lies in an open subinterval, so neither endpoint derivative nor either endpoint value of f was used.

step 1.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources