How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative
Statement
Let . Suppose is continuous on and differentiable on . If is Riemann integrable and
then
No derivative of at either endpoint is assumed, and the two endpoint values assigned to the integrable extension do not enter the conclusion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Reals , a continuous differentiable on , and an integrable agreeing there with .
If a function is continuous on and differentiable on , then some satisfies (The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with ).
For a partition , the lower and upper Darboux sums are obtained by multiplying each subinterval length by the infimum and supremum of there (Partition of as a finite strictly increasing list , its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions, The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded on as and , Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation ).
If is integrable with integral , then every lower sum is at most and every upper sum is at least (The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded on as and , Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation ).
Proof
Fix a partition of . For each , [L1] gives such that .
If and are the infimum and supremum of on , then .
Summing step 2.1 and telescoping the increments of gives .
Taking the supremum of the lower sums and the infimum of the upper sums, which coincide because is integrable, yields .
Every lies in an open subinterval, so neither endpoint derivative nor either endpoint value of was used.
Depends on
- The mean value theorem, as the case $g(x) = x$ of Cauchy's: for $f$ continuous on $[a,b]$ with $a < b$ and differentiable on $(a,b)$ there is $c \in (a,b)$ with $f(b) - f(a) = f'(c)(b-a)$
- The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded $f$ on $[a,b]$ as $\sup_P L(f,P)$ and $\inf_P U(f,P)$, Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation $\int_a^b f$
- Partition of $[a,b]$ as a finite strictly increasing list $a = t_0 < t_1 < \dots < t_n = b$, its subintervals and their lengths, its mesh, refinement, and the common refinement of two partitions
Used by
- Newton–Leibniz remains valid across finitely many exceptional interior points when the primitive is continuous Corollary
- G(x)=x² sin(1/x) has a bounded derivative discontinuous at 0 that is nevertheless Riemann integrable, and Newton–Leibniz evaluates its integral Example
- Integration by parts for continuous factors with Riemann-integrable extensions of their interior derivatives Theorem
- Substitution for a continuous inner map with a Riemann-integrable extension of its interior derivative, without monotonicity or injectivity Theorem
- The two FTC forms for a Riemann–Stieltjes integral with a C¹ integrator Theorem
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 66 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. K. Hunter, An Introduction to Real Analysis, Chapter 12 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Lebl, Basic Analysis I & II, Section 5.3 (standard reference, not scraped)