How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compact-support Stokes on Euclidean space
Statement
For and , with the standard orientation, .
Facts & Assumptions
Chart integral with its orientation sign: Let be oriented and a smooth top form with compact support contained in a connected chart . For write Let be the sign of its coordinate frame relative to the chosen orientation. Define the chart integral by Here is the Riemann-integrable zero extension, including across a genuine half-space face, as in lem-chart-supported-coefficients-have-well-defined-riemann-integrable-half-space-extensions. For , a connected chart is a point , and set using its determinant-line sign. Empty support gives zero. Negative charts are allowed: the upper-half-line chart at the right endpoint of an increasing interval has sign .
Form calculus extends locally across a manifold boundary: On smooth manifolds with boundary, the coordinate exterior derivative, pullback naturality, graded Leibniz rule, support containment, and Cartan identity hold for smooth forms: For arbitrary smooth vector fields at boundary points, is defined by local Euclidean extensions; a two-sided flow inside the manifold is not required.
A continuous function on a closed rectangle has repeated Riemann integrals in every coordinate order, all equal to its multiple integral: Let , where and every . If is continuous, then for every permutation of the coordinates the corresponding repeated Riemann integral exists and equals .
Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative: Let . Suppose is continuous on and differentiable on . If is Riemann integrable and then No derivative of at either endpoint is assumed, and the two endpoint values assigned to the integrable extension do not enter the conclusion.
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
Write . The coordinate formula gives . Choose with the support inside , so all vanish near the outer faces.
Each derivative coefficient is continuous on the nondegenerate cube. Repeated Riemann integration may put first. Its integral along that coordinate is by the fundamental theorem. Thus every term integrates to zero.
The chart definition and linearity give the asserted zero sum. For there is one coefficient and the omitted wedge is the scalar one, so this is just the endpoint difference. Empty support and give the same identity.
Depends on
- Chart integral with its orientation sign
- Form calculus extends locally across a manifold boundary
- A continuous function on a closed rectangle has repeated Riemann integrals in every coordinate order, all equal to its multiple integral
- Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on $[a,b]$, differentiability on $(a,b)$, and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lee Theorem 16.11 proof pp.412–413; Merry Theorem 26.17 (standard reference, not scraped)