Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compact-support Stokes on the upper half-space

Statement

Give Hn={xn0} the standard orientation, n1, and its face the outward-normal-first orientation. If ηΩcn1(Hn) and j:HnHn, then Hndη=Hnjη. With η=iaidx1dxi^dxn, both sides are (1)nRn1an(x,0)dx for n>1, and a1(0) for n=1.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Compact-support Stokes on Euclidean space: For n1 and ηΩcn1(Rn), with the standard orientation, Rndη=0.

[F2]

Induced boundary orientation: For an oriented manifold with boundary, orient TpM by the outward-normal-first rule: an outward vector first, followed by a positive boundary determinant, is a positive determinant of TpM.

[F3]

Integral of a compactly supported top form: Assume ACω. For an oriented smooth manifold Mn, possibly with boundary, and ωΩcn(M), choose a smooth partition (ρi) subordinate to connected interior or boundary charts (Ui,ϕi). For n1 set Mω=iIϕi(ρiω). Each product has compact support in its chart and only finitely many are nonzero, by lem-a-locally-finite-sum-is-finite-near-the-compact-support-of-a-form. For n=0 set Mω=psuppωε(p)ω(p). A zero-manifold is discrete; the singleton open cover of a compact subset has a finite subcover. Thus this sum too is finite. Empty support or empty M gives zero. Independence of the choices is discharged by thm-global-form-integration-is-independent-of-the-atlas-partition-and-refinement.

[F4]

Integration on an oriented embedded submanifold: Let j:SM be an oriented embedded smooth k-submanifold, with boundary allowed. For a smooth k-form ω on M such that jω has compact support on S, define Sω:=Sjω. If F:TS is an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism, this equals T(jF)ω. Compact support is required on S itself.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1

Choose a rectangle [R,R]n1×[0,R] with the support away from all artificial faces. Use the omitted-coordinate expansion and the repeated-integral/FTC calculation in the Euclidean lemma’s proof on this half-rectangle. Its derivative coefficients are continuous up to the face. For i<n both coordinate endpoint values vanish. For i=n the endpoint difference is an(x,0). With the derivative sign (1)n1, the integral is (1)nan(x,0)dx.

F1F3
2.1

Pullback to the face kills every term containing dxn, leaving an(x,0)dx1dxn1. The outward vector is en, and (en,e1,,en1) has determinant (1)n in the ambient standard frame. Thus the face coordinate sign is (1)n, exactly the sign found above.

F2F4step 1.1
3.1

For n=1, the outward vector at zero is e1, so the induced determinant-line point sign is 1 and the boundary integral is a1(0). This is the same FTC endpoint difference. If the form is zero or its support misses the face, both expressions are zero.

F2F3step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources