How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compact-support Stokes on the upper half-space
Statement
Give the standard orientation, , and its face the outward-normal-first orientation. If and , then With , both sides are for , and for .
Facts & Assumptions
Compact-support Stokes on Euclidean space: For and , with the standard orientation, .
Induced boundary orientation: For an oriented manifold with boundary, orient by the outward-normal-first rule: an outward vector first, followed by a positive boundary determinant, is a positive determinant of .
Integral of a compactly supported top form: Assume . For an oriented smooth manifold , possibly with boundary, and , choose a smooth partition subordinate to connected interior or boundary charts . For set Each product has compact support in its chart and only finitely many are nonzero, by lem-a-locally-finite-sum-is-finite-near-the-compact-support-of-a-form. For set A zero-manifold is discrete; the singleton open cover of a compact subset has a finite subcover. Thus this sum too is finite. Empty support or empty gives zero. Independence of the choices is discharged by thm-global-form-integration-is-independent-of-the-atlas-partition-and-refinement.
Integration on an oriented embedded submanifold: Let be an oriented embedded smooth -submanifold, with boundary allowed. For a smooth -form on such that has compact support on , define . If is an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism, this equals . Compact support is required on itself.
Proof
Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.
Choose a rectangle with the support away from all artificial faces. Use the omitted-coordinate expansion and the repeated-integral/FTC calculation in the Euclidean lemma’s proof on this half-rectangle. Its derivative coefficients are continuous up to the face. For both coordinate endpoint values vanish. For the endpoint difference is . With the derivative sign , the integral is .
Pullback to the face kills every term containing , leaving . The outward vector is , and has determinant in the ambient standard frame. Thus the face coordinate sign is , exactly the sign found above.
For , the outward vector at zero is , so the induced determinant-line point sign is and the boundary integral is . This is the same FTC endpoint difference. If the form is zero or its support misses the face, both expressions are zero.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lee Theorem 16.11 proof, pp.412–413 (standard reference, not scraped)