Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Localization of Stokes by a partition of unity

Statement

Assume ACω. Let Mn be oriented with boundary, n≥1, η∈Ωcn−1(M), and (ρi) a smooth chart partition. Then η=∑iρiη,dη=∑id(ρiη),∑idρi∧η=0, with only finitely many nonzero form summands. Boundary restrictions have the corresponding finite localization and compact support, so these identities can be integrated termwise.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Form calculus extends locally across a manifold boundary: On smooth manifolds with boundary, the coordinate exterior derivative, pullback naturality, graded Leibniz rule, support containment, and Cartan identity hold for smooth forms: d(F∗α)=F∗(dα),d(α∧β)=dα∧β+(−1)deg⁡αα∧dβ, supp⁡dα⊆supp⁡α,LXα=d(ιXα)+ιXdα. For arbitrary smooth vector fields at boundary points, LX is defined by local Euclidean extensions; a two-sided flow inside the manifold is not required.

[F2]

Local finiteness near compact support: If (Ci)i∈I is a locally finite family of closed subsets of a manifold and K is compact, only finitely many Ci meet K. There is an open neighborhood of K disjoint from all the other Ci. In particular, for a smooth partition of unity (ρi) and ω∈Ωck(M), only finitely many ρiω are nonzero.

[F3]

Linearity and additivity of the form integral: For compactly supported smooth top forms ω,η on an oriented Mn and a,b∈R, ∫M(aω+bη)=a∫Mω+b∫Mη. Also ∫Mω=∑C∫Cω∣C, where C ranges over connected components with their restricted orientations; only finitely many meet supp⁡ω.

[F4]

Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds with boundary: Assume ACω. Every open cover of a smooth manifold with boundary admits a smooth partition of unity subordinate to it.

[F5]

The boundary of a positive-dimensional manifold is a closed embedded smooth (n-1)-manifold: If M has dimension n≥1, the restrictions of boundary charts to their faces give ∂M the structure of a closed embedded smooth boundaryless (n−1)-manifold. For n=0, ∂M=∅.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1F2F4

The partition exists under the stated choice hypothesis. The compact-support lemma supplies a neighborhood of K=supp⁡η on which only finitely many weights occur. There their sum is one and the sum of their differentials is zero.

2.1F1step 1.1

Leibniz gives ∑id(ρiη)=∑idρi∧η+∑iρidη=dη near K. Outside K, both η and dη vanish, as do all products and their derivatives on a neighborhood. Thus the identities hold globally with finite relevant sums, also for empty support.

3.1F3F5step 2.1∎

The boundary is closed, so K∩∂M is compact and contains the support of j∗η. Restrict the finite sum to this boundary and apply linearity of integration there and on M. For n=1 the boundary restriction is a function on the discrete boundary and its compact support is finite.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources