Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Localization of Stokes by a partition of unity

Statement

Assume ACω. Let Mn be oriented with boundary, n1, ηΩcn1(M), and (ρi) a smooth chart partition. Then η=iρiη,dη=id(ρiη),idρiη=0, with only finitely many nonzero form summands. Boundary restrictions have the corresponding finite localization and compact support, so these identities can be integrated termwise.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Form calculus extends locally across a manifold boundary: On smooth manifolds with boundary, the coordinate exterior derivative, pullback naturality, graded Leibniz rule, support containment, and Cartan identity hold for smooth forms: d(Fα)=F(dα),d(αβ)=dαβ+(1)degααdβ, suppdαsuppα,LXα=d(ιXα)+ιXdα. For arbitrary smooth vector fields at boundary points, LX is defined by local Euclidean extensions; a two-sided flow inside the manifold is not required.

[F2]

Local finiteness near compact support: If (Ci)iI is a locally finite family of closed subsets of a manifold and K is compact, only finitely many Ci meet K. There is an open neighborhood of K disjoint from all the other Ci. In particular, for a smooth partition of unity (ρi) and ωΩck(M), only finitely many ρiω are nonzero.

[F3]

Linearity and additivity of the form integral: For compactly supported smooth top forms ω,η on an oriented Mn and a,bR, M(aω+bη)=aMω+bMη. Also Mω=CCωC, where C ranges over connected components with their restricted orientations; only finitely many meet suppω.

[F4]

Smooth partitions of unity exist on manifolds with boundary: Assume ACω. Every open cover of a smooth manifold with boundary admits a smooth partition of unity subordinate to it.

[F5]

The boundary of a positive-dimensional manifold is a closed embedded smooth (n-1)-manifold: If M has dimension n1, the restrictions of boundary charts to their faces give M the structure of a closed embedded smooth boundaryless (n1)-manifold. For n=0, M=.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1

The partition exists under the stated choice hypothesis. The compact-support lemma supplies a neighborhood of K=suppη on which only finitely many weights occur. There their sum is one and the sum of their differentials is zero.

F2F4
2.1

Leibniz gives id(ρiη)=idρiη+iρidη=dη near K. Outside K, both η and dη vanish, as do all products and their derivatives on a neighborhood. Thus the identities hold globally with finite relevant sums, also for empty support.

F1step 1.1
3.1

The boundary is closed, so KM is compact and contains the support of jη. Restrict the finite sum to this boundary and apply linearity of integration there and on M. For n=1 the boundary restriction is a function on the discrete boundary and its compact support is finite.

F3F5step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources