Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Radial geodesics minimize length in a normal neighborhood

Statement

Assume ACω. Suppose expp:Bρ(0p)U is a diffeomorphism, where ρ>0, and let vBρ(0p). The radial geodesic γv(t)=expp(tv), 0t1, has length vgp and minimizes length among all piecewise smooth curves in U from p to expp(v).

If v0, equality holds precisely for the monotone radial reparametrizations c(t)=expp(r(t)vvgp), where r is continuous, piecewise smooth, nondecreasing, and has endpoint values 0 and vgp. For v=0, equality holds precisely for the constant curve.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The normal ball, vector, and competitor curves in the statement.

[A1]
[F1]

Under [A1], Gauss lemma gives unit radial speed, and Polar form of the metric in normal coordinates gives cg2=(r)2+cg2 wherever cp. Riemannian speed and length defines length by finitely many speed integrals.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Write R=vgp. By radial norm preservation in [F1], γ˙v(t)g=R, so L(γv)=01Rdt=R.

F1given
1.2

Let c:[a,b]U be piecewise smooth with c(a)=p, c(b)=expp(v), and put r(t)=expp1(c(t))gp. Assume first R>0 and fix 0<δ<R. By [F2], the set Kδ={t:r(t)=δ} is nonempty; it is closed in the compact interval and hence compact, so [F2] gives its greatest element τδ. Then r(t)>δ for t>τδ: otherwise continuity and r(b)=R>δ would produce a later point of Kδ. Thus c avoids p on [τδ,b].

F2given
2.1

On every smooth piece of [τδ,b], [F1] gives cgr. Summing the monotone integral inequalities and using [F3] gives L(c)L(c[τδ,b])τδbrdtRδ. Since this holds for every 0<δ<R, L(c)R. If R=0, nonnegativity already gives L(c)0=L(γv). This proves minimality without differentiating r at a visit to p.

F1F3step 1.1step 1.2
2.2

Conversely, for a curve of the displayed form, [F1] gives cg=r=r on each smooth piece. Newton--Leibniz and finite additivity in [F3] give L(c)=R, including any constant pauses. If R=0, equality means L(c)=0; [F3] forces the continuous speed to vanish on each smooth piece, so c is constant.

F1F3step 1.1
3.1

The same argument proves the auxiliary estimate L(d)r(d1)r(d0) for any piecewise smooth d:[d0,d1]U: if d avoids p, integrate the polar inequality directly; if it meets p, split there and apply step 2.1 to the reversed first part and the second part.

F1F3step 2.1
4.1

Suppose now R>0 and L(c)=R. For any t, step 2.1 on the prefix and step 3.1 on the suffix give R=L(c[a,t])+L(c[t,b])r(t)+Rr(t). Hence r(t)R, and equality forces the two lower bounds to be equal. If a<u<w<b and c avoids p on [u,w], applying the prefix, middle, and suffix bounds gives Rr(u)+r(w)r(u)+Rr(w). Therefore r(w)r(u) and equality holds in the middle polar length estimate.

F1step 2.1step 3.1
5.1

On a closed subinterval of one smooth piece on which cp, step 4.1 and Newton--Leibniz give zero integral for the continuous nonnegative function cgr. By [F3] it vanishes identically. The polar identity in [F1] then gives c=0 and r0. Writing expp1(c)=rθ with θ=1, invertibility of dexpp gives rθ=0; hence [F3] makes θ constant on every nonzero component. A component that later returned to p would have positive nondecreasing r tending to zero, which is impossible. Thus c is constant at p until its final nonzero component, and there θ=v/R and r is nondecreasing. This proves the stated necessary form.

F1F3step 4.1
6.1

Steps 2.1, 5.1, and 2.2 prove minimality and both equality directions. In dimension zero only v=0 occurs; dimension one permits the two radial directions and the proof fixes the one containing v. Empty M has no centre. The open-ball condition excludes v=ρ, while v=0, visits to the centre, subdivision endpoints, and constant pauses were treated explicitly. Assumption [A1] is used exactly through [F1] for the exponential and polar structures; last hitting times are unique maxima, and no further choice is made.

A1F1F2F3step 2.1step 5.1step 2.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

88 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources