Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Polar form of the metric in normal coordinates

Statement

Assume ACω. Let U=expp(D) be a normal neighbourhood centred at p in a Riemannian manifold without boundary, and on U{p} define r(q)=expp1(q)gp. Then r is smooth and rg=1. Its radial unit vector is rq=d(expp)v(vvgp),v=expp1(q), and r=r. The tangent spaces to the level hypersurfaces of r are orthogonal to r; equivalently, away from the centre, g=dr2+gr, where gr is the restriction of g to the tangent spaces of the radial level sets. There are no radial--angular cross terms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The centred normal neighbourhood in the statement.

[A1]
[F1]

Under [A1], Normal neighborhood and normal coordinate chart gives an open star-shaped DTpM and a diffeomorphism expp:DU.

[F2]

Under [A1], Gauss lemma gives g(dexpv(v),dexpv(w))=gp(v,w), radial norm preservation, and radial orthogonality to images of sphere-tangent vectors.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

On D{0} the norm vvgp is smooth, so composing it with the smooth inverse of [F1] proves that r is smooth on U{p}. If q=expp(v), v0, and zTvDTpM, differentiation gives drq(dexpv(z))=gp(v,z)vgp.

F1algebra
2.1

Put er=v/vgp. By [F2], r=dexpv(er) has norm one. For every X=dexpv(z)TqU, [F2] and step 1.1 give gq(r,X)=gp(er,z)=drq(X). By the defining identity for the gradient and nondegeneracy of g, this proves r=r and r=1.

F1F2step 1.1
3.1

Decompose uniquely z=aer+z, where a=gp(z,er) and zv. Step 1.1 gives a=drq(X), while [F2] makes dexpv(z) orthogonal to r. Thus X=drq(X)r+X,Xkerdrq. For two vectors X,Y, bilinearity and the two vanishing cross terms give gq(X,Y)=drq(X)drq(Y)+gq(X,Y). Since dr0, kerdrq is the tangent space of the radial level hypersurface through q. This is exactly g=dr2+gr.

F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra
4.1

The centre is excluded because the norm need not be differentiable at zero; no polar formula is asserted there. In dimension zero U{p} is empty. In dimension one the level tangent space is zero and the formula reduces to g=dr2. An empty manifold has no centre. Positive and negative radial coordinate endpoints do not occur: r>0 on the stated domain, while arbitrary boundaries of the star-shaped set D are not included. Assumption [A1] is inherited exactly through [F1]--[F2]; the unique orthogonal decomposition is a formula and requires no further choice.

A1F1F2step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources