Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A closed subset of a compact metric space is compact

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A compact metric space (X,d) and a closed subset F⊆X.

[L1]

(X,d) is compact: every family of open subsets of X with union X has a finite subfamily with union X (Open cover, subcover, compact metric space, and compact subset of a metric space).

[L2]

A subset A⊆X is a compact subset exactly when for every set I and every family (Ui)i∈I of open subsets of X with A⊆⋃i∈IUi there are n∈N and i0,…,in∈I with A⊆Ui0∪⋯∪Uin, or else A=∅; and X is a compact subset of itself, its subspace metric being d (A subset of a metric space is open in the subspace metric exactly when it is the trace of an open set of the ambient space, and it is compact as a metric space in its own right exactly when every family of open subsets of the ambient space covering it, indexed or not, has finitely many members covering it, Isometry, isometric embedding, and the subspace metric on a subset).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

X∖F is open in X.

L3
1.2

By the ambient characterisation it suffices to show that every family (Ui)i∈I of open subsets of X with F⊆⋃i∈IUi has finitely many members whose union contains F, or that F=∅; so fix such a family.

L2suffices: finitely many members cover F
2.1

Take an object ∗ not in I, put I+:=I∪{∗} and U∗:=X∖F; then (Ui)i∈I+ is a family of open subsets of X whose union is X, since a point outside F lies in U∗ and a point of F lies in some Ui with i∈I.

L1L2step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

Applying the ambient characterisation to the compact subset X of itself gives n∈N and j0,…,jn∈I+ with X=Uj0∪⋯∪Ujn, unless X=∅, in which case F=∅ and there is nothing to prove.

L2step 2.1
4.1

Delete from the list j0,…,jn every entry equal to ∗; what remains is a finite list of indices from I, possibly empty, and the union of the corresponding sets still contains F, because U∗=X∖F contains no point of F while every point of F lies in one of the listed sets.

step 3.1
5.1

If that remaining list is empty then F=∅, and otherwise it exhibits finitely many members of (Ui)i∈I whose union contains F; in both cases the condition of step 1.2 is met, so F is a compact subset of X.

L2step 1.2step 4.1∎

Remarks

The hypothesis that X is compact cannot be dropped, and neither can closedness. A closed subset of a non-compact space need not be compact: the whole space is closed in itself. And a non-closed subset of a compact space need not be compact, since a compact subset of any metric space is closed (A compact subset of a metric space is closed and bounded).

Why the augmented family is the whole trick. The set F is covered by the Ui, but X need not be; adjoining the single open set X∖F repairs that at no cost, and it is the only member of the resulting finite subcover that has to be discarded again at the end.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources