Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The poincare lemma says every closed form is globally exact

Statement

False claim: the Poincaré lemma makes every closed positive-degree form globally exact on every smooth manifold.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: α=(−y dx+x dy)/(x2+y2) on R2∖{0}.

[F1]

Poincare lemma for differential forms on star shaped domains: Every closed smooth k-form on a star-shaped open domain is exact for k≥1. For centre 0, one primitive is ηx(v1,…,vk−1)=∫01tk−1ωtx(x,v1,…,vk−1) dt.

[F2]

Closed and exact differential forms: For the complex def-de-rham-cochain-complex, put Zk(M)=ker⁡(d:Ωk(M)→Ωk+1(M)) and Bk(M)=im⁡(d:Ωk−1(M)→Ωk(M)). A form is closed if it belongs to Zk and exact if it belongs to Bk. If ω=dη, then dω=d2η=0 by thm-the-exterior-derivative-squares-to-zero, so Bk⊆Zk. In particular B0=0, since Ω−1=0. The zero form is both closed and exact in every degree.

[F3]

The local coordinate formula for the exterior derivative: Let (U,x1,…,xn) be a smooth chart on a smooth manifold and ω a smooth k-form on U, with k≥0. Summing over increasing k-tuples I, and writing dxI=dxi1∧⋯∧dxik, if ω=∑IωI dxI, then dω=∑IdωI∧dxI.

[F4]

Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative: Let a<b. Suppose G:[a,b]→R is continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b). If f:[a,b]→R is Riemann integrable and f(x)=G′(x)(a<x<b), then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a). No derivative of G at either endpoint is assumed, and the two endpoint values assigned to the integrable extension f do not enter the conclusion.

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1F2F3given

Put r2=x2+y2. The coefficients are smooth since r2>0, and ∂x(x/r2)=(y2−x2)/r4=∂y(−y/r2). Thus dα=0.

2.1F1F4step 1.1∎

For γ(t)=(cos⁡t,sin⁡t), 0≤t≤2π, substitution gives γ∗α=(sin⁡2t+cos⁡2t)dt=dt. If α=df, the chain rule and fundamental theorem would give 2π=∫02πγ∗α=f(γ(2π))−f(γ(0))=0. This contradiction proves nonexactness. The Poincaré lemma has a star-shaped-domain hypothesis, which this global witness does not satisfy.

Source locator

Lee, formula (17.1), p.441; direct coordinate differentiation and the fundamental theorem prove the obstruction without importing a later example.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources