How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The poincare lemma says every closed form is globally exact
Statement
False claim: the Poincaré lemma makes every closed positive-degree form globally exact on every smooth manifold.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: on .
Poincare lemma for differential forms on star shaped domains: Every closed smooth -form on a star-shaped open domain is exact for . For centre , one primitive is .
Closed and exact differential forms: For the complex def-de-rham-cochain-complex, put and . A form is closed if it belongs to and exact if it belongs to . If , then by thm-the-exterior-derivative-squares-to-zero, so . In particular , since . The zero form is both closed and exact in every degree.
The local coordinate formula for the exterior derivative: Let be a smooth chart on a smooth manifold and a smooth -form on , with . Summing over increasing -tuples , and writing , if , then
Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative: Let . Suppose is continuous on and differentiable on . If is Riemann integrable and then No derivative of at either endpoint is assumed, and the two endpoint values assigned to the integrable extension do not enter the conclusion.
Refutation
Put . The coefficients are smooth since , and . Thus .
For , , substitution gives . If , the chain rule and fundamental theorem would give . This contradiction proves nonexactness. The Poincaré lemma has a star-shaped-domain hypothesis, which this global witness does not satisfy.
Source locator
Lee, formula (17.1), p.441; direct coordinate differentiation and the fundamental theorem prove the obstruction without importing a later example.
Depends on
- Poincare lemma for differential forms on star shaped domains
- Closed and exact differential forms
- The local coordinate formula for the exterior derivative
- Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on $[a,b]$, differentiability on $(a,b)$, and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative
- A nonzero period obstructs exactness and bounding
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, second edition (standard reference, not scraped)