How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Continuously homotopic smooth maps can be inserted directly into the differential form homotopy operator
Statement
False claim: an arbitrary continuous homotopy between smooth maps can be inserted directly into the differential-form homotopy operator.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: is a point, , and on .
Integration along the unit interval for a differential form: Let be smooth up to the endpoints. For , its interval integral is the -form , where and both families are tangential to . Set on degree zero and on zero terms. Use the product structure of prop-products-of-smooth-manifolds-have-a-canonical-product-smooth-structure, restricted from . The families are intrinsically and , using def-interior-product-of-a-form-by-a-vector-field; evaluation on tangential tuples and on proves existence and uniqueness of the decomposition. The integral is in the fixed finite-dimensional fibre . Coefficients have smooth local extensions across endpoints. thm-differentiation-under-the-integral-sign-on-a-compact-rectangle supplies parameter differentiation; coordinate independence and full smoothness are proved in lem-the-interval-homotopy-operator-is-coordinate-independent.
De rham homotopy formula for a smooth homotopy: If is smooth up to the endpoints and , then .
Refutation
The function is continuous, and are smooth maps from a point. At the left derivative is and the right derivative is , so has no differential there.
The operator for a homotopy is on smooth forms, and pullback of requires at every point. At the midpoint this pullback is undefined as a smooth differential form. The smooth-homotopy formula therefore cannot accept this particular continuous homotopy directly.
Source locator
Lee, Lemma 17.9 and Proposition 17.10, pp.444–445: the operator acts on smooth pullbacks; the cusp is a direct witness to the missing hypothesis.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John M. Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, second edition (standard reference, not scraped)