Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Substitution for a continuous inner map with a Riemann-integrable extension of its interior derivative, without monotonicity or injectivity

Statement

Let c<d, let J=[p,q] with p<q, and let f:J→R be continuous. Suppose φ:[c,d]→J is continuous on [c,d] and differentiable on (c,d), and that the interior derivative has a Riemann-integrable extension h:[c,d]→R. Then (f∘φ)h is Riemann integrable and

∫cdf(φ(t))h(t) dt=∫φ(c)φ(d)f(x) dx.

The limits on the right are oriented. No injectivity or monotonicity of φ is required; the identity also covers φ(c)>φ(d) and φ(c)=φ(d).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The functions and intervals in the statement.

[L1]

A continuous integrand has an integral function differentiable at every point, with derivative equal to that integrand (The first fundamental theorem: if f is integrable on [a,b] and continuous at c, then F′(c)=f(c); in particular a continuous f has F as a primitive).

[L4]

A continuous function with an interior derivative admitting an integrable extension satisfies Newton--Leibniz (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative).

[L5]

Oriented integrals satisfy ∫uuf=0 and ∫vuf=−∫uvf (The integral with oriented limits: ∫aaf:=0 and ∫baf:=−∫abf).

Proof

technique · reduction
1.1

Fix r∈J and define H(x):=∫rxf with oriented limits. By [L1], H is differentiable on J and H′=f, including relative endpoint derivatives.

givenL1L5
1.2

The composite f∘φ is continuous and hence integrable; its product with the integrable h is integrable by [L3].

givenL3
2.1

The composite H∘φ is continuous on [c,d], differentiable on (c,d), and [L2] gives (H∘φ)′(t)=f(φ(t))h(t) there.

givenstep 1.1L2
3.1

Applying [L4] to H∘φ gives ∫cd(f∘φ)h=H(φ(d))−H(φ(c)).

step 2.1step 1.2L4
4.1

The oriented definition in [L5] gives H(v)−H(u)=∫uvf for every u,v∈J, whether u<v, u=v, or u>v. Taking u=φ(c) and v=φ(d) completes all three endpoint-order cases.

step 1.1L5algebra∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources