Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Riemannian length is invariant under orientation preserving piecewise c one reparametrization

Statement

If φ:[c,d][a,b] is a continuous nondecreasing surjection, piecewise C1, and γ is piecewise C1, then γφ is piecewise C1 and Lg(γφ)=Lg(γ). Constant intervals of φ are allowed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The maps in the statement, with compact parameter intervals.

[F1]

Riemannian length is independent of piecewise c one subdivision: Riemannian length is independent of admissible finite subdivision and of corner derivative conventions.

[F2]

Substitution for a continuous inner map with a Riemann-integrable extension of its interior derivative, without monotonicity or injectivity: Let c<d, let J=[p,q] with p<q, and let f:JR be continuous. Suppose φ:[c,d]J is continuous on [c,d] and differentiable on (c,d), and that the interior derivative has a Riemann-integrable extension h:[c,d]R. Then (fφ)h is Riemann integrable and cdf(φ(t))h(t)dt=φ(c)φ(d)f(x)dx. The limits on the right are oriented. No injectivity or monotonicity of φ is required; the identity also covers φ(c)>φ(d) and φ(c)=φ(d).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For each of the finitely many breakpoints tj of γ, its fibre under φ is a closed interval or singleton by monotonicity and continuity. Refine [c,d] at their endpoints and at the breakpoints of φ. Each remaining piece either maps into one C1 piece of γ or is a constant fibre; thus the composition is piecewise C1.

givenconstruct
2.1

On a nonconstant piece [u,v], the chain rule and φ0 give ddt(γφ)g=γ˙(φ(t))gφ(t). Speed on the target piece is continuous and the derivative of φ is continuous up to one-sided endpoints, so the substitution theorem applies and gives length φ(u)φ(v)γ˙(s)gds. Constant fibres have zero speed and zero endpoint difference. Summing gives the full target integral because monotone surjectivity sends c to a and d to b. Partition independence removes the refinements. Degenerate singleton intervals give zero on both sides.

F1F2step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, Chapter 13, pp.337–340, Proposition 13.25, Lemma 13.28 and Theorem 13.29; finite piecewise C1 refinements and pauses are treated explicitly here.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources