Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Length is additive under concatenation and invariant under reversal

Statement

Length adds under finite concatenation and is unchanged by reversal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Piecewise C1 curves, with matching endpoints for concatenation.

[F1]

Riemannian length is independent of piecewise c one subdivision: Riemannian length is independent of admissible finite subdivision and of corner derivative conventions.

[F2]

Line integrals under reversal and concatenation: Let γ be a piecewise-C1 path, and let f be a continuous scalar field and F a continuous vector field on a set containing its trace. Then ∫γ−f ds=∫γf ds,∫γ−F⋅dr=−∫γF⋅dr. If piecewise-C1 paths α,β:[0,1]→Rn satisfy α(1)=β(0), and f and F are continuous on a set containing both traces, then ∫α∗βf ds=∫αf ds+∫βf ds, ∫α∗βF⋅dr=∫αF⋅dr+∫βF⋅dr.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

For curves α,β on [0,1], their concatenation has derivatives 2α˙(2t) on the first half and 2β˙(2t−1) on the second. Substitution gives the two contributions Lg(α) and Lg(β), hence their sum. The same finite integral calculation as for scalar line integrals applies to these scalar speeds.

2.1F1F2step 1.1∎

The reversed curve γ−(t)=γ(a+b−t) has velocity −γ˙(a+b−t) and therefore the same norm at the reversed time. Substitution reverses the integration limits and cancels the minus sign, giving Lg(γ−)=Lg(γ). Repeating the first calculation proves finite concatenation; constant pieces and zero-length intervals contribute zero.

Source locator

Lee, Chapter 13, pp.337–340, Proposition 13.25, Lemma 13.28 and Theorem 13.29; finite piecewise C1 refinements and pauses are treated explicitly here.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources