Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

De rham homotopy formula on a product

Statement

For endpoint inclusions it:MM×[0,1], i1i0=dK+Kd on smooth forms of every degree.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Write ω=αt+dtβt with tangential families.

[F1]

The interval homotopy operator is coordinate independent: The interval operator K:Ωk(M×[0,1])Ωk1(M) is coordinate independent and maps smooth forms to smooth forms.

[F2]

The local coordinate formula for the exterior derivative: Let (U,x1,,xn) be a smooth chart on a smooth manifold and ω a smooth k-form on U, with k0. Summing over increasing k-tuples I, and writing dxI=dxi1dxik, if ω=IωIdxI, then dω=IdωIdxI.

[F3]

Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative: Let a<b. Suppose G:[a,b]R is continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b). If f:[a,b]R is Riemann integrable and f(x)=G(x)(a<x<b), then abf=G(b)G(a). No derivative of G at either endpoint is assumed, and the two endpoint values assigned to the integrable extension f do not enter the conclusion.

[F4]

Integration along the unit interval for a differential form: For ω=αt+dtβt smooth up to the endpoints, Kω=01βtdt in positive degree, while K=0 in degree zero and on zero terms.

[F5]

Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral: On a compact rectangle, a continuous parameter derivative may be passed through the integral when represented by a continuous function.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The coordinate differential gives dω=dMαt+dt(tαtdMβt): the minus sign follows from moving dM past dt. Consequently the definition F4 gives Kdω=01tαtdt01dMβtdt.

F2F4given
2.1

The fundamental theorem on each coefficient gives the first integral as α1α0. By F4, Kω=01βtdt; coefficientwise F5 permits each M-coordinate derivative through this compact parameter integral, so F2 gives dMKω=01dMβtdt. Since itω=αt, rearrangement proves the formula. In degree zero, β=0 and this is just the fundamental theorem; in top or out-of-range degrees the vanishing terms satisfy the same identity.

F1F2F3F4F5step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, Introduction to Smooth Manifolds, 2nd ed., Lemma 17.9 and Proposition 17.10, pp.444–445; the proof here computes the product differential directly.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources