Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Type II boundary identity for the Q dy term

Statement

Let

D={(x,y):cyd, λ(y)xρ(y)}

be a Type II region, and let Q be C1 on an open neighbourhood of D. With the positive boundary orientation,

DQdy=DxQdA.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The region, function, and orientation in the Statement.

[L1]

The positive Type II boundary traverses the right graph upward, the top endpoint arc right to left, the left graph downward, and the bottom endpoint arc left to right, omitting zero-length arcs (Positive orientation of elementary-region boundaries).

[L2]

The line integral Qdy is the vector line integral of (0,Q); it adds under concatenation and changes sign under reversal (Scalar line integrals with respect to arc length and vector-field line integrals, Line integrals under reversal and concatenation).

[L3]

For a bounded Jordan set E and an integrable g:ER whose sections Ex are Jordan measurable with gx integrable outside a content-zero set of parameters, Eg=h where h(x)=Exgx and an empty section contributes 0; the symmetric assertion holds for the other coordinate block (Fubini over a bounded Jordan set when all but a content-zero family of sections are integrable).

[L4]

A continuous function whose interior derivative admits an integrable extension satisfies Newton-Leibniz: that extension integrates to the endpoint increment (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative).

[L5]

A compact Type II region is D={(x,y):cyd, λ(y)xρ(y)} for continuous piecewise-C1 functions λρ on [c,d], defined analogously to the Type I case, so c<d and λ<ρ on (c,d) (Type I, Type II, and elementary regions for Green's theorem).

[L6]

For a<b and continuous αβ on [a,b], the region K={(x,y):axb, α(x)yβ(x)} between the two graphs is compact and Jordan measurable (A region between two continuous graphs is Jordan measurable, and a continuous integrand extending to its closure integrates by vertical sections).

[L7]

A linear endomorphism of Rn sends every bounded Jordan set to a bounded Jordan set (A linear endomorphism of Rn sends bounded Jordan sets to bounded Jordan sets and scales their content by the absolute determinant).

[L8]

Every continuous real function on a compact Jordan measurable set is Riemann integrable over that set (A continuous real function on a compact Jordan measurable set is Riemann integrable over that set).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The horizontal endpoint arcs in [L1] have constant y, so their contributions to Qdy are zero. The right graph contributes cdQ(ρ(y),y)dy, and [L2] makes the downward left graph contribute cdQ(λ(y),y)dy.

givenL1L2algebra
1.2

For each fixed y with λ(y)<ρ(y), [L4] in the x variable gives Q(ρ(y),y)Q(λ(y),y)=λ(y)ρ(y)xQ(x,y)dx. Since λ<ρ on (c,d), this covers every interior y. At y=c and y=d the region definition requires only λ(y)ρ(y), so both cases occur: where λ(y)<ρ(y), as for a rectangle, the same application of [L4] applies verbatim, and where λ(y)=ρ(y) both sides are zero. Hence the displayed identity holds for every y[c,d].

givenL4
1.3

By [L5] the data satisfy c<d and λρ continuous on [c,d], and D is compact. The coordinate swap σ(x,y)=(y,x) is linear and satisfies σσ=id, and σ(D)={(u,v):cud, λ(u)vρ(u)} is the region between the graphs of λ and ρ over the first coordinate, so [L6] applies to it with a=c, b=d, α=λ, β=ρ and makes it compact and Jordan measurable. Since σ(D) is therefore a bounded Jordan set, [L7] makes its image D=σ(σ(D)) a bounded Jordan set as well. The hypothesis of [L6], that the region lies between two graphs over an interval of its FIRST coordinate, is verified for σ(D) and is never asserted of D.

givenL5L6L7
2.1

Hence DQdy=cd(Q(ρ(y),y)Q(λ(y),y))dy.

step 1.1algebra
2.2

Q is C1 on an open neighbourhood of D, so xQ is continuous on D; with step 1.3 this makes D a compact Jordan measurable set, and [L8] makes xQ integrable over it. For y[c,d] the section {x:(x,y)D} is the compact interval [λ(y),ρ(y)], whose boundary is at most two points, so it is Jordan measurable in R; the restriction xxQ(x,y) is continuous there, so [L8] makes it integrable over that section. Every section at y[c,d] is empty. The exceptional set of [L3] may therefore be taken empty.

givenstep 1.3L3L8algebra
3.1

By steps 1.3 and 2.2, the symmetric-coordinate assertion of [L3] applies to E=D and g=xQ with y as the outer coordinate, so DxQdA=cd(λ(y)ρ(y)xQ(x,y)dx)dy, the outer integrand vanishing off [c,d] because those sections are empty. Substituting step 1.2 into step 2.1 gives the same iterated integral for DQdy.

step 1.3step 2.2step 2.1step 1.2L3
4.1

Zero-length endpoint arcs and piecewise-C1 joins contribute nothing beyond subdivision, by [L1] and [L2].

L1L2step 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 168 results over 26 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources