Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Poincare's lemma on a star-shaped domain: every closed C1 field is exact

Statement

Let U⊆Rn be open and star-shaped with respect to a∈U. Every closed C1 field F:U→Rn is exact. A C2 potential is

ϕ(x):=∫01⟨F(a+t(x−a)),x−a⟩ dt.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The star-shaped domain, centre, and closed C1 field in the Statement.

[L1]

Star-shapedness gives a+t(x−a)∈U for every x∈U and 0≤t≤1 (Star-shaped open subsets of Euclidean space).

[L2]

Closedness is the system ∂jFi=∂iFj, and exactness requires a C2 function with gradient F (Exact and closed C1 vector fields).

[L3]

On a compact rectangle, a continuous parameter derivative may be passed through the integral when it is represented by a continuous function (Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral).

[L4]

If a continuous function has an integrable interior derivative on a compact interval, the integral of that derivative is the endpoint increment (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative).

[L5]

Continuous partial derivatives imply total differentiability, with derivative matrix equal to the Jacobian (If all partial derivatives exist on a neighbourhood and are continuous at a point, then the map is totally differentiable there with Jacobian derivative).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the integrand defining ϕ(x) is defined for every t∈[0,1]; it is continuous, so the integral exists. Fix x∈U and a coordinate j. Openness and [L1] provide a small closed coordinate interval about x whose radial segments from a remain in U.

givenL1
2.1

On that interval, [L3] differentiates the defining integral with respect to xj and gives ∂jϕ(x)=∫01(Fj(zt)+t∑i∂jFi(zt)(xi−ai))dt, where zt=a+t(x−a). The integrand and its parameter derivative are continuous because F is C1.

step 1.1L3algebra
3.1

By closedness in [L2], ∂jFi=∂iFj. Thus the integrand in step 2.1 is Fj(zt)+t∑i∂iFj(zt)(xi−ai)=ddt(tFj(zt)).

givenstep 2.1L2algebra
4.1

Apply [L4] to step 3.1. The endpoint at t=0 is 0⋅Fj(a)=0, and the endpoint at t=1 is Fj(x), so ∂jϕ(x)=Fj(x).

step 2.1step 3.1L4algebra
5.1

Since this holds for every x and j, the partial derivatives of ϕ are the C1 functions Fj. In particular they are continuous, so [L5] gives ∇ϕ=F, and their first partials are continuous; hence ϕ is C2.

step 4.1L5given
6.1

By the definition in [L2], step 5.1 makes F exact with the displayed potential.

step 5.1L2∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

22 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources