Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The generator of a unitary group is closed and skew-adjoint

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and Dependent Choice. The generator G of a strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group U is densely defined, closed, and skew-adjoint: G=G. Consequently T=iG is self-adjoint with D(T)=D(G).

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Both Q±(λ) have range D(G) and satisfy Q±(λ)y=0eλtU(±t)ydt with Q±(λ)1/λ; also (λG)Q±(λ)=I and Q±(λ)(λG)=I on D(G) (Laplace resolvents of a unitary group).

[A2]

U(t)x,U(t)y=x,y and tU(t)x,U(t)y is differentiable at 0 with derivative Gx,y+x,Gy when x,yD(G), by the definition of G and sesquilinearity and continuity of the inner product (Infinitesimal generator of a unitary group, Strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group, Hilbert space, Cauchy–Schwarz: x,yxy, with equality exactly for dependent pairs).

[A3]

A densely defined symmetric operator S with ran(S±i)=H is self-adjoint (Range criterion for self-adjointness, Symmetric, self-adjoint and essentially self-adjoint operators).

[A4]

A bounded everywhere-defined inverse to 1G puts 1 in the resolvent of G and forces its graph closed, with convention RG(1)=(IG)1 (Resolvent and spectrum of an unbounded operator, Densely defined, closed and closable operators, and cores). The exact limit argument is also given below.

[A5]

The Bochner integral is linear by passage from simple integral approximations, and its norm is bounded by the integral of the norm (Bochner-integrable function, Bochner integral norm inequality). Compact Newton--Leibniz, the Countable Choice Riemann/Lebesgue bridge and monotone convergence compute aλeλtdt=eλa for a0, λ>0, by the primitive eλt on [a,N] followed by N (Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative, A bounded Riemann integrable function on a closed bounded interval is Lebesgue measurable and has the same integral, Monotone convergence for the integral).

[A6]

The adjoint domain consists of vectors making xSx,y bounded on D(S), with Sx,y=x,Sy in the first-variable-linear convention (Adjoint of a densely defined operator).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: Countable Choice, Dependent Choice, and a strongly continuous unitary group U with generator G.

1.1

D(G) is dense: for yH and λ>0, [A1] gives λQ+(λ)yD(G) and λQ+(λ)yy=0λeλt(U(t)yy)dt. Given ε>0, strong continuity supplies δ>0 such that U(t)yy<ε for 0tδ; the integral norm is then at most ε+2yeλδ. Letting λ and then ε0 proves λQ+(λ)yy. Taking positive integer λ supplies an approximating sequence in D(G) for every y. Thus D(G) is dense.

A1A5given
1.2

G is skew-symmetric: the function tU(t)x,U(t)y is constant with value x,y for x,yD(G), so its derivative at 0 vanishes, that is Gx,y+x,Gy=0; equivalently Gx,y=x,Gy.

A2
1.3

G is closed: with R=Q+(1), [A1] and [A4] already imply closedness. Explicitly, if xnD(G), xnx and Gxny, then xn=R(xnGxn)R(xy) since R is bounded. Uniqueness of limits gives x=R(xy)D(G) and (IG)x=(IG)R(xy)=xy, hence Gx=y. The sequential graph criterion is valid in the norm metric under the assumed Countable Choice.

A1A4
2.1

On D(T)=D(G) set T=iG. For x,y in this domain, step 1.2 gives Tx,y=iGx,y=ix,Gy=x,Ty, so T is symmetric. It is densely defined by step 1.1. It is closed: convergence of xn and Txn implies convergence of Gxn=iTxn, so step 1.3 applies. The correct signed formulas are T+iI=i(IG) and TiI=i(I+G). Both ranges equal H by the two signs of [A1] at λ=1; multiplication by a nonzero scalar preserves surjectivity. Hence [A3] makes T self-adjoint.

A1A3step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3
3.1

The adjoint domain of T=iG equals that of G: multiplication of the scalar functional in [A6] by i preserves boundedness in both directions. For y in this domain, Tx,y=iGx,y=ix,Gy=x,iGy; uniqueness of the representing vector gives T=iG. Step 2.1 gives T=T=iG including domains, hence D(G)=D(G) and G=G.

A6step 2.1
4.1

The conclusions are density, closedness and skew-adjointness from steps 1.1, 1.3 and 3.1, and self-adjointness of iG from step 2.1. The zero space and constant identity group satisfy the same identities directly. The declared Countable Choice and Dependent Choice match the Laplace supplier; Countable Choice also licenses the range/adjoint and integration interfaces. Only strictly positive Laplace parameters are used.

A1A3A5A6step 1.1step 1.3step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

78 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources