How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Monotone convergence for the integral
Statement
Let be measurable and suppose for every . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nondecreasing sequence of nonnegative measurable functions with pointwise limit .
The nonnegative integral is monotone (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).
For a nonnegative simple function , the set function is a measure (The indefinite integral of a nonnegative simple function is a measure).
Measures are continuous from below on increasing measurable sets (Continuity from below for measures).
The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions, and the latter is homogeneous on nonnegative simple functions (The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions, The simple integral is monotone, homogeneous, and additive).
Proof
By [L1], the integrals increase and are bounded above by . Write , so in .
Fix a finite-valued nonnegative simple function and . Set . The sets increase to : where membership is automatic, and where , the limit eventually forces . Since is a measure [L2], continuity from below [L3] gives .
On , , hence everywhere. By monotonicity [L1] and simple-integral agreement and homogeneity [L4], . Letting in step 1.2 yields . Letting a fixed sequence shows , also when the simple integral is infinite.
The inequality from step 2.1 holds for every admissible simple minorant . Taking their supremum, as in The nonnegative Lebesgue integral, gives . Combine this with step 1.1 to obtain .
Depends on
- The nonnegative Lebesgue integral
- Integral over a measurable subset
- The indefinite integral of a nonnegative simple function is a measure
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- Every nonnegative measurable function is the increasing limit of simple measurable functions
- Continuity from below for measures
- The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions
- The simple integral is monotone, homogeneous, and additive
Used by
- A C¹ diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L¹ functions Corollary
- Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral Corollary
- Almost-everywhere monotone convergence Corollary
- Beppo Levi's theorem for nonnegative series Corollary
- Brownian paths have infinite total variation Corollary
- Distribution of a one-sided Brownian hitting time Corollary
- Dominated convergence is a Vitali corollary Corollary
- Expected duration of symmetric gambler's ruin Corollary
- Finite propagation for scalar conservation laws Corollary
- Global L¹ contraction from the local estimate Corollary
- Law of the Brownian maximum Corollary
- Polar integration may discard the cut locus Corollary
- Reverse Fatou's lemma under an integrable majorant Corollary
- Uniqueness, comparison and order preservation of entropy solutions Corollary
- Unitary groups converge under strong resolvent convergence Corollary
- Vector Levy characterization Corollary
- Wald first equation under integrable stopping Corollary
- A BMO function need not be globally integrable Counterexample
- A decreasing sequence need not satisfy a monotone convergence theorem without an integrable start Counterexample
- A limit of discrete series is not square-integrable Counterexample
- A nonintegrable observable with divergent ergodic averages Counterexample
- A radial Poisson limit does not control a tangential path Counterexample
- A random variable need not have a finite expectation Counterexample
- An unbounded predictable transform may lose integrability Counterexample
- An unbounded stopped exponential martingale needs uniform integrability Counterexample
- Hilbert transform is not strong type (1,1) Counterexample
- Iid strong law fails at infinite absolute mean Counterexample
- Infinite variance can defeat square-root-n CLT scaling Counterexample
- Integrable stopping time alone does not suffice for arbitrary martingale increments Counterexample
- Subcritical W^1,p is not closed under multiplication Counterexample
- Taking out an unbounded factor needs integrability Counterexample
- The sine integral is improperly Riemann integrable and not Lebesgue integrable Counterexample
- Continuous covariant model and measurable completion Definition
- Green kernel of a transient chain Definition
- Invariant and stationary distribution for a Markov kernel Definition
- The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral Definition
- A Brownian hitting time has infinite mean Example
- A Dirac mass has precisely sufficiently negative Sobolev order Example
- A square-integrable discrete-series matrix coefficient Example
- An explicit ∂̄ solution with an L² estimate Example
…and 182 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard F. Bass, Real Analysis for Graduate Students, Theorem 7.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory Notes, Theorem 4.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Theorem 2.14 (standard reference, not scraped)