How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Almost-everywhere monotone convergence
Statement
Let be measurable, let be measurable, and suppose almost everywhere. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A measurable nonnegative function and a nondecreasing sequence of nonnegative measurable functions with almost everywhere.
Monotone convergence holds when the pointwise increase is everywhere (Monotone convergence for the integral).
A nonnegative integral over a measurable null set is (A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes).
The nonnegative integral is additive (Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral).
Proof
Let be a measurable null set outside which , and define and .
Then everywhere, and is measurable because is. So [L1] gives .
Each difference and is supported on the null set .
Therefore [L2] and [L3] give
Substituting into step 1.1 yields the result. [step 1.1, L2, L3] ∎
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Corollary 2.17 (standard reference, not scraped)