How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes
Statement
Let be measurable and let be measurable with . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonnegative measurable function and a measurable null set .
The set function is a measure whenever is nonnegative simple (The indefinite integral of a nonnegative simple function is a measure).
The integral over a measurable set is defined by (Integral over a measurable subset).
The nonnegative integral is the supremum of the integrals of simple minorants (The nonnegative Lebesgue integral).
Proof
Let be a nonnegative simple minorant of , with . If , then because outside ; hence . The simple-integral formula, equivalently the finite-sum calculation in [L1], gives , including when the original representation overlaps.
Taking the supremum over all such simple minorants in [L3] gives .
Depends on
Used by
- A C¹ diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L¹ functions Corollary
- Almost-everywhere monotone convergence Corollary
- Polar integration may discard the cut locus Corollary
- The obstacle reaction is supported on the contact set under measure regularity Corollary
- A step has no locally integrable weak derivative Counterexample
- An absolutely continuous finite measure can have an unbounded Radon-Nikodym derivative Counterexample
- Lp and Sobolev classes do not determine point values Counterexample
- Null-set modifications defeat everywhere representative recovery Counterexample
- The complementarity product needs extra regularity Counterexample
- Two Radon-Nikodym derivatives can differ on a null set Counterexample
- x⁻¹dλ on (0,1) shows finiteness is needed in the epsilon-delta criterion Counterexample
- Discrete martingale transform Definition
- The standard intertwining operator A(nu) Definition
- A boundary atom gives an h1 function without an L1 density Example
- A piecewise-quadratic distribution function recovers its density Example
- Projective-plane curvature via a hemisphere Example
- The absolute value has a weak first derivative Example
- The chain rule for Radon-Nikodym derivatives on [0,1] Example
- The one-dimensional obstacle reaction is supported on the contact set Example
- The positive-type Gaussian on the real line and its cyclic model Example
- Weighted interval volume Example
- FALSE: absolutely continuous measures always have bounded Radon-Nikodym derivatives False statement
- FALSE: the epsilon-delta condition characterises absolute continuity for every measure False statement
- FALSE: the Radon-Nikodym derivative is a uniquely determined function False statement
- Agreement of Borel overlap integrals Lemma
- Bounded compact data give an everywhere finite Newtonian potential Lemma
- Continuous lattice-periodic functions are determined by their lattice Fourier coefficients Lemma
- K-type eigenvalues of A(nu): recurrence, closed form and nonvanishing Lemma
- Orthogonality of the lattice characters over a fundamental domain Lemma
- Conditional expectation exists by radon nikodym Theorem
- Conditional monotone convergence Theorem
- Cut locus of a point has riemannian volume zero Theorem
- Dominated convergence Theorem
- Every sigma-finite signed measure admits a Lebesgue decomposition relative to a sigma-finite positive measure Theorem
- Hardy–Littlewood–Sobolev fractional integration inequality Theorem
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases Theorem
- Lower semicontinuity of logarithmic potential and energy Theorem
- Measurable essentially bounded operator fields act decomposably Theorem
- Measurable integration extends smooth density integration Theorem
- Newtonian potentials solve the distributional Poisson equation Theorem
…and 2 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard F. Bass, Real Analysis for Graduate Students, Proposition 6.3(4) (standard reference, not scraped)