How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes
Statement
Let be measurable and let be measurable with . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A nonnegative measurable function and a measurable null set .
The set function is a measure whenever is nonnegative simple (The indefinite integral of a nonnegative simple function is a measure).
The integral over a measurable set is defined by (Integral over a measurable subset).
The nonnegative integral is the supremum of the integrals of simple minorants (The nonnegative Lebesgue integral).
Proof
Let be a simple minorant of . If ,[L1, L2, given] then , so . Since is a measure by [L1], every positive-coefficient term contributes , and the zero-coefficient terms contribute as well. Hence .
Taking the supremum over all such simple minorants in [L3] gives[step 1.1, L2, L3] ∎
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard F. Bass, Real Analysis for Graduate Students, Proposition 6.3(4) (standard reference, not scraped)