How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Discrete martingale transform
Definition
Let be an adapted integrable real process Adapted and integrable stochastic process and let be finite real predictable Predictable discrete time process. Provided define the discrete transform by For a martingale integrator this is its martingale transform. The product-integrability condition is part of the domain.
The finite-integral facts used here can be recovered without the published simple-display gap. Augment every finite disjoint display of a nonnegative simple function by the complement of its displayed sets with coefficient . Intersections of two augmented displays partition the whole space, and equality of the functions forces equal coefficients on every nonempty cell. Finite additivity and prove representation independence. Common refinements give simple monotonicity and additivity; homogeneity is direct for scalar and termwise for a positive scalar. Taking suprema over simple minorants, using increasing simple approximations and the sets for , gives monotone convergence and nonnegative additivity. Positive/negative and real/imaginary decompositions then give finite linearity.
The two factors of the th summand are -measurable because . Measurable arithmetic Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined makes the product measurable; it is integrable by hypothesis. Every finite sum is therefore -measurable and integrable by the locally reconstructed linearity (the unaffected remainder of The Lebesgue integral is linear on gives the same calculation). At zero the sum is empty and equals zero.
A useful sufficient condition is a.s. with deterministic , separately at each time. On the complement of its measurable null failure set, The integral on the failure set is zero by A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes; the locally reconstructed monotonicity, positive homogeneity and finite linearity give No uniform bound in time is needed. Changing measurable representatives at finitely many relevant times changes a finite sum only on the finite union of their measurable null discrepancy sets. Outside the stipulated domain the same algebraic sum may be finite pointwise but is not an integrable transform. These finite arithmetic and integral arguments are choice-free.
Depends on
- Adapted and integrable stochastic process
- Predictable discrete time process
- The Lebesgue integral is linear on $L^1(\mu)$
- Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, fifth edition (standard reference, not scraped)