How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Lebesgue integral is linear on
Statement
The class is a complex vector space, and the Lebesgue integral is complex-linear on it:
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Integrable functions and scalars .
Real and complex integrability, together with the decomposition into positive and negative parts and into real and imaginary parts, is defined in Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals.
The nonnegative integral is additive (Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral).
The nonnegative integral is monotone and homogeneous (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).
Sums and real scalar multiples of measurable real-valued functions are measurable (Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral).
Proof
First treat real-valued and put . By [L4], the function is measurable. Also so [L2] and [L3] give Hence is integrable. Since another application of [L2] yields which rearranges to
Now let and let be real-valued. By [L4], is measurable. If , then if , then In both cases [L3] shows that is integrable and that
Let and . Then The real-valued functions and are integrable by steps 1.1 and 1.2, and their real-linear integral formulas combine into Writing and with real-valued integrable , step 1.1 gives
Depends on
Used by
- Linearity can fail without an integrability hypothesis Counterexample
- FALSE: the Lebesgue integral extends linearly to all measurable functions False statement
- The indefinite integral of an integrable function is countably additive on measurable sets Proposition
- Dominated convergence Theorem
- Jensen's integral inequality for a probability measure Theorem
- The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus Theorem
- Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard F. Bass, Real Analysis for Graduate Students, Theorem 7.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory Notes, Proposition 4.9 (standard reference, not scraped)